BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32809166)

  • 1. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS): diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement.
    Basha MAA; Refaat R; Ibrahim SA; Madkour NM; Awad AM; Mohamed EM; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Dawoud HA; Khamis MEM; Mohamed HAE; El-Maghraby AM; Abdalla AAEM; Assy MM; Nada MG; Obaya AA; Abdelbary EH
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):5981-5990. PubMed ID: 30993433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
    Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses.
    Cao L; Wei M; Liu Y; Fu J; Zhang H; Huang J; Pei X; Zhou J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 33966893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External Validation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Lexicon and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-Step Strategy to Stratify Ovarian Tumors Into O-RADS Risk Groups.
    Timmerman S; Valentin L; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Landolfo C; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Kaijser J; Scambia G; Andreotti R; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B; Froyman W
    JAMA Oncol; 2023 Feb; 9(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 36520422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules to Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Guidelines for Detection of Malignancy in Adnexal Cysts.
    Patel-Lippmann KK; Sadowski EA; Robbins JB; Paroder V; Barroilhet L; Maddox E; McMahon T; Sampene E; Wasnik AP; Blaty AD; Maturen KE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 31770022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic performance of IOTA SR and O-RADS combined with CA125, HE4, and risk of malignancy algorithm to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Yang Y; Ju H; Huang Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110926. PubMed ID: 37418798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and ADNEX for Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses: An External Validation Study Conducted by Junior Sonologists.
    Lai HW; Lyu GR; Kang Z; Li LY; Zhang Y; Huang YJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 34549454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
    Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
    J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GI-RADS reporting system for ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses in clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study.
    Amor F; Alcázar JL; Vaccaro H; León M; Iturra A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 21465605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of O-RADS Ultrasound and O-RADS MRI for Risk Assessment of Ovarian and Adnexal Lesions.
    Zhang Q; Dai X; Li W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 36722758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
    Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
    Zhang T; Li F; Liu J; Zhang S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Combing O-RADS US and CA-125 Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Assessing Adnexal Malignancy Risk in Women With Different Menopausal Status?
    Wu M; Wang Q; Zhang M; Cao J; Chen Y; Zheng J; Luo L; Su M; Lin X; Kuang X; Zhang X
    J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 35880406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver agreement between eight observers using IOTA simple rules and O-RADS lexicon descriptors for adnexal masses.
    Antil N; Raghu PR; Shen L; Tiyarattanachai T; Chang EM; Ferguson CWK; Ho AA; Lutz AM; Mariano AJ; Morimoto LN; Kamaya A
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Sep; 47(9):3318-3326. PubMed ID: 35763052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
    Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of the Ovarian-Adnexa Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses.
    Wang T; Cui W; Nie F; Huang X; Huang L; Liu L; Zhu Y; Zheng R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2072-2080. PubMed ID: 37321953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving risk stratification of indeterminate adnexal masses on MRI: What imaging features help predict malignancy in O-RADS MRI 4 lesions?
    Wong BZY; Causa Andrieu PI; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki EM; Vargas HA; Woo S
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111122. PubMed ID: 37806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.