214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3280989)
1. Evaluation of the SOS chromotest.
von der Hude W; Behm C; Gürtler R; Basler A
Mutat Res; 1988 Apr; 203(2):81-94. PubMed ID: 3280989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Further studies on the detection of mutagenic and genotoxic activity in human faeces: aerobic and anaerobic fluctuation tests with S. typhimurium and E. coli, and the SOS Chromotest.
Venitt S; Bosworth D
Mutagenesis; 1986 Jan; 1(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 3325736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The SOS Chromotest, a colorimetric bacterial assay for genotoxins: validation study with 83 compounds.
Quillardet P; de Bellecombe C; Hofnung M
Mutat Res; 1985 Jun; 147(3):79-95. PubMed ID: 3889610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SOS induction of selected naturally occurring substances in Escherichia coli (SOS chromotest).
Kevekordes S; Mersch-Sundermann V; Burghaus CM; Spielberger J; Schmeiser HH; Arlt VM; Dunkelberg H
Mutat Res; 1999 Sep; 445(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 10521693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epoxides: comparison of the induction of SOS repair in Escherichia coli PQ37 and the bacterial mutagenicity in the Ames test.
von der Hude W; Seelbach A; Basler A
Mutat Res; 1990 Aug; 231(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 2200956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Characteristics of the mutagenic and toxic effects of ethylene imine and its oligomers. Comparative study in the automated SOS-chromotest system and in standard bacterial test systems].
Tanirbergenov TB; Vasil'eva SV; Kostianovskiĭ RG; Rappoport IA; Huttunen T
Genetika; 1988 Apr; 24(4):763-5. PubMed ID: 3294106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the SOS chromotest for detection of genotoxic drugs.
Marczewska J; Chłopkiewicz B; Ejchart A; Koziorowska J
Acta Microbiol Pol; 1993; 42(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 7509561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the SOS chromotest, the Ames-fluctuation test and the newt micronucleus test to study the genotoxicity of four trihalomethanes.
Le Curieux F; Gauthier L; Erb F; Marzin D
Mutagenesis; 1995 Jul; 10(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 7476270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of mutagenic and SOS-inducing activity of biphenyls, phenanthrenequinones and fluorenones.
Vasilieva S; Tanirbergenov B; Abilev S; Migatchev G; Huttunen MT
Mutat Res; 1990 Aug; 244(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 2200960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of SOS repair by monofunctional methanesulphonates in various Escherichia coli strains. Structure-activity relationships in comparison with mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium.
Eder E; Favre A; Deininger C; Hahn H; Kütt W
Mutagenesis; 1989 May; 4(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 2543887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SOS induction in Escherichia coli and Salmonella mutagenicity: a comparison using 330 compounds.
Mersch-Sundermann V; Schneider U; Klopman G; Rosenkranz HS
Mutagenesis; 1994 May; 9(3):205-24. PubMed ID: 7934961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Escherichia coli K-12 SOS chromotest agar spot test for simple, rapid detection of genotoxic agents.
Mamber SW; Okasinski WG; Pinter CD; Tunac JB
Mutat Res; 1986; 171(2-3):83-90. PubMed ID: 3092040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genotoxicity of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and related structures on Escherichia coli PQ37 (SOS chromotest).
Mersch-Sundermann V; Kern S; Wintermann F
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1991; 18(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 1864268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genotoxicity assessment of waste products of aluminum plasma etching with the SOS chromotest.
Raabe F; Janz S; Wolff G; Merten H; Landrock A; Birkenfeld T; Herzschuh R
Mutat Res; 1993 Jul; 300(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 7685499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The new SOS chromotest (CEA test) for demonstrating mutagens and promutagens based on the indicator strain Salmonella typhimurium TA1535].
Egorov IA; Svistunova GL; Darkazanli K; Kalinina LM; Tarasov VA
Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR; 1991; 318(5):1230-2. PubMed ID: 1914822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an SOS-Chromotest-based approach for the isolation and detection of sediment-associated genotoxins.
Bombardier M; Bermingham N; Legault R; Fouquet A
Chemosphere; 2001 Mar; 42(8):931-44. PubMed ID: 11272916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applicability of the SOS Chromotest to detect urinary mutagenicity caused by smoking.
De Méo MP; Miribel V; Botta A; Laget M; Duménil G
Mutagenesis; 1988 May; 3(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 3137423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing human faecal extracts for genotoxic activity with the SOS Chromotest: the importance of controlling for faecal enzyme activity.
Bosworth D; Venitt S
Mutagenesis; 1986 Mar; 1(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 3146011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Construction and evaluation of a cea-lacZ gene fusion for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens.
Schumann W; Songür N; Miltenburger HG
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1991 Jul; 65(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 1916230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genotoxicity assessment of low-level doses of gamma radiation with the SOS chromotest and the Ames test.
Bolsunovsky AY; Sinitsyna OI; Frolova TS; Vasyunina EA; Dementyev DV
Dokl Biochem Biophys; 2016 Jul; 469(1):309-12. PubMed ID: 27599519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
