148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32810057)
1. Trust, Peer Review, and the Pandemic.
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2020 Sep; 33(9):455-456. PubMed ID: 32810057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Publish or perish: Panic publishing a danger to science during COVID-19.
Shoib S; Das S; Ullah I; De Berardis D
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2021 Jul; 55(7):733. PubMed ID: 33938267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The peer review process and JSES procedures.
Iannotti JP; Mallon WJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Feb; 22(2):149. PubMed ID: 23352468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The ethics of peer review: What to know before saying "yes".
Siedlecki SL
Nurs Manage; 2016 Jul; 47(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 27351121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ghost- and guest-authored pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies: abuse of academic integrity, the peer review system, and public trust.
Flaherty DK
Ann Pharmacother; 2013; 47(7-8):1081-3. PubMed ID: 23585648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Yet another example of lack of laboratory expertise in certain biomedical publications.
Hacini J; Watine J
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Apr; 40(4):426-7. PubMed ID: 12059089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research on covid-19 is suffering "imperfect incentives at every stage".
Armstrong S
BMJ; 2020 May; 369():m2045. PubMed ID: 32467100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review of biomedical manuscripts: an update.
Ludbrook J
J Clin Neurosci; 2003 Sep; 10(5):540-2. PubMed ID: 12948455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trust in Peer Review.
Barber MD; Gregory WT
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Oct; 26(10):595-596. PubMed ID: 32925425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How can the scientific community ensure the integrity of COVID-19 research?
Vogel L
CMAJ; 2020 Jul; 192(28):E817-E818. PubMed ID: 32660943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting the results of randomized clinical trials: a priority of Archives of Ophthalmology.
Beck RW
Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 122(7):1038-9. PubMed ID: 15249369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review: an essential step in the publishing process.
Weil J
J Genet Couns; 2004 Jun; 13(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 15617209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might.
de Jonge P; Conradi HJ; Thombs BD; Rosmalen JG; Burger H; Ormel J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Feb; 65(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 21113013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editing during COVID-19: one year later.
Nat Methods; 2021 Apr; 18(4):323-324. PubMed ID: 33828271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Truth in Science Publishing: A Personal Perspective.
Südhof TC
PLoS Biol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):e1002547. PubMed ID: 27564858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiating predatory scholarship: best practices in scholarly publication.
Gonzalez J; Bridgeman MB; Hermes-DeSantis ER
Int J Pharm Pract; 2018 Feb; 26(1):73-76. PubMed ID: 28664997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open access: is the scientific quality of biomedical publications threatened?
Barreiro E
Arch Bronconeumol; 2013 Dec; 49(12):505-6. PubMed ID: 24029469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prizes galore!
Burton GJ; Sadovsky Y; Clifton V
Placenta; 2013 Jan; 34(1):1. PubMed ID: 23261270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The discourteous reviewer.
Leviton A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
