167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32810385)
1. Variability in accuracy of prostate cancer segmentation among radiologists, urologists, and scientists.
Chen MY; Woodruff MA; Dasgupta P; Rukin NJ
Cancer Med; 2020 Oct; 9(19):7172-7182. PubMed ID: 32810385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy Validation of an Automated Method for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Shahedi M; Cool DW; Bauman GS; Bastian-Jordan M; Fenster A; Ward AD
J Digit Imaging; 2017 Dec; 30(6):782-795. PubMed ID: 28342043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and Variability of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: A Blinded Comparison of Radiologists.
Pickersgill NA; Vetter JM; Andriole GL; Shetty AS; Fowler KJ; Mintz AJ; Siegel CL; Kim EH
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):267-272. PubMed ID: 30327280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Segmentation of prostate zones using probabilistic atlas-based method with diffusion-weighted MR images.
Singh D; Kumar V; Das CJ; Singh A; Mehndiratta A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105572. PubMed ID: 32544780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists' and patients' perception.
Porpiglia F; Bertolo R; Checcucci E; Amparore D; Autorino R; Dasgupta P; Wiklund P; Tewari A; Liatsikos E; Fiori C;
World J Urol; 2018 Feb; 36(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 29127451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility of the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System for muscle-invasive bladder cancer between radiologists and urologists based on multiparametric MRI including 3D FSE T2-weighted acquisitions.
Arita Y; Shigeta K; Akita H; Suzuki T; Kufukihara R; Kwee TC; Ishii R; Mikami S; Okuda S; Kikuchi E; Oya M; Jinzaki M
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):875-883. PubMed ID: 32829418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging: The truth lies in the eye of the beholder.
Riney JC; Sarwani NE; Siddique S; Raman JD
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):159.e1-159.e5. PubMed ID: 29336979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine Segmentation of Pelvic Anatomy in MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS) for Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy.
Sanders JW; Lewis GD; Thames HD; Kudchadker RJ; Venkatesan AM; Bruno TL; Ma J; Pagel MD; Frank SJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1292-1303. PubMed ID: 32634543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis.
Martin PR; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073504. PubMed ID: 24989418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for Prostate MRI Segmentation and Comparison of Prostate Volume Measurements by Use of Artificial Neural Network and Ellipsoid Formula.
Lee DK; Sung DJ; Kim CS; Heo Y; Lee JY; Park BJ; Kim MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1229-1238. PubMed ID: 32208009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatially varying accuracy and reproducibility of prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance images using manual and semiautomated methods.
Shahedi M; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Bauman GS; Bastian-Jordan M; Gibson E; Rodrigues G; Ahmad B; Lock M; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):113503. PubMed ID: 25370674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D imaging technologies in minimally invasive kidney and prostate cancer surgery: which is the urologists' perception?
Amparore D; Pecoraro A; Checcucci E; DE Cillis S; Piramide F; Volpi G; Piana A; Verri P; Granato S; Sica M; Manfredi M; Fiori C; Autorino R; Porpiglia F
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 74(2):178-185. PubMed ID: 33769019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of MRI for diagnosis of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer.
Krishna S; Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Shabana WM; Lim RS; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 47(1):176-185. PubMed ID: 28387981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists.
Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-retest repeatability of a deep learning architecture in detecting and segmenting clinically significant prostate cancer on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps.
Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Merisaari H; Prasanna P; Ettala O; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Boström PJ; Jambor I; Madabhushi A
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):379-391. PubMed ID: 32700021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fully automatic segmentation on prostate MR images based on cascaded fully convolution network.
Zhu Y; Wei R; Gao G; Ding L; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhang J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Apr; 49(4):1149-1156. PubMed ID: 30350434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists' training.
de Rooij M; Israël B; Tummers M; Ahmed HU; Barrett T; Giganti F; Hamm B; Løgager V; Padhani A; Panebianco V; Puech P; Richenberg J; Rouvière O; Salomon G; Schoots I; Veltman J; Villeirs G; Walz J; Barentsz JO
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5404-5416. PubMed ID: 32424596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structured reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to improve interdisciplinary communication.
Wetterauer C; Winkel DJ; Federer-Gsponer JR; Halla A; Subotic S; Deckart A; Seifert HH; Boll DT; Ebbing J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212444. PubMed ID: 30779810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
