These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32810609)

  • 21. Comparative Study Between M6-C and Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Biomechanical Outcomes and Comparison with Normative Data.
    Pham M; Phan K; Teng I; Mobbs RJ
    Orthop Surg; 2018 May; 10(2):84-88. PubMed ID: 29878713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical spine kinematics after anterior cervical discectomy with or without implantation of a mobile cervical disc prosthesis; an RCT.
    Boselie TF; van Mameren H; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():34. PubMed ID: 25887569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study.
    Wigfield CC; Gill SS; Nelson RJ; Metcalf NH; Robertson JT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2446-52. PubMed ID: 12435973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does design matter? Cervical disc replacements under review.
    Staudt MD; Das K; Duggal N
    Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Apr; 41(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27465393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. History of cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Baaj AA; Uribe JS; Vale FL; Preul MC; Crawford NR
    Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Sep; 27(3):E10. PubMed ID: 19722812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Artificial Discs in Cervical Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis for Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes.
    Wahood W; Yolcu YU; Kerezoudis P; Goyal A; Alvi MA; Freedman BA; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():598-613.e5. PubMed ID: 31627001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center.
    Barrey C; Mosnier T; Jund J; Perrin G; Skalli W
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Nov; 11(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19929355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.
    Kowalczyk I; Lazaro BC; Fink M; Rabin D; Duggal N
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec; 15(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 21905776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical intervertebral disc replacement.
    Cason GW; Herkowitz HN
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Feb; 95(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 23389792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
    Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cervical disc replacement surgery: indications, technique, and technical pearls.
    Leven D; Meaike J; Radcliff K; Qureshi S
    Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med; 2017 Jun; 10(2):160-169. PubMed ID: 28493215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.
    Zeng J; Liu H; Rong X; Wang B; Yang Y; Gao X; Wu T; Hong Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Aug; 19(1):285. PubMed ID: 30086733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of cervical kinematics between patients with cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disc herniation.
    Lee JH; Kim JS; Lee JH; Chung ER; Shim CS; Lee SH
    Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1199-204. PubMed ID: 24183464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of mobility and stability in the Discover artificial disc: an in vivo motion study using high-accuracy 3D CT data.
    Skeppholm M; Svedmark P; Noz ME; Maguire GQ; Olivecrona H; Olerud C
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 26047344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sagittal alignment after single cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Guérin P; Obeid I; Gille O; Bourghli A; Luc S; Pointillart V; Vital JM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Feb; 25(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 22124426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Motion preservation surgery in the spine.
    Murtagh R; Castellvi AE
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2014 May; 24(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 24792608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
    Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Influence of intraoperative cervical posture in single segmental cervical disc replacement on restoration of cervical curve in neutral position].
    Hong Y; Deng Y; Liu H; Gong R; An L; Gong Q; Li T; Song Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 27(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 23427495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Qureshi SA; McAnany S; Goz V; Koehler SM; Hecht AC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):546-54. PubMed ID: 24010896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.