These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3281082)
1. Reproduction technology: cataloging the criticisms. A legal view. Grey L Ohio Med; 1988 Mar; 84(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 3281082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproduction technology: cataloging the criticisms. An ethical view. Horn P Ohio Med; 1988 Mar; 84(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 3281081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions. Ross DH Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproduction technology: cataloging the criticisms (Part II). The medical views. An obstetrician's view. Sanders JH Ohio Med; 1988 Apr; 84(4):303-4. PubMed ID: 3283618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproduction technology: cataloging the criticisms (Part II). The medical views. An ethics professor's view.. Troup SB Ohio Med; 1988 Apr; 84(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 3283617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal aspects of human and genetic engineering. Rozovsky LE Manit Law J; 1975; 6(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 11662232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Capacity, competence, consent: voluntary sterilization of the mentally retarded. Neuwirth GS; Heisler PA; Goldrich KS Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):447-72. PubMed ID: 11663600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The dispersion of genetic technologies and the law. Clayton EW Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(3 Suppl):S13-5. PubMed ID: 11654184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sterilizing the retarded: constitutional, statutory and policy alternatives. Sherlock RK; Sherlock RD North Carol Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 60(5):943-83. PubMed ID: 11658718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing for genetic traits: the need for a new legal doctrine of informed consent. Cooper EB MD Law Rev; 1999; 58(2):346-422. PubMed ID: 11660778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sterilization of mental defectives: compulsion and consent. Comer D Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):174-98. PubMed ID: 11660881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation. Burnett BA Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The legal status of the A.I.D. child in Australia. Mayo M Aust Law J; 1976 Nov; 50(11):562-7. PubMed ID: 11661413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A survey of the legal aspects of organ transplantation. Shapiro SA Chic Kent Law Rev; 1973; 50(3):510-25. PubMed ID: 11664358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legislating for an informed consent to medical treatment by competent adults. Magnet SR McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11650589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Government could be sued over human experimentation problems. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Oct; 11(10):6. PubMed ID: 11656530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protecting the unconceived: nonexistence, avoidability, and reproductive technology. Peters PG Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):487-548. PubMed ID: 11659319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]