These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32811725)
1. Assessment of compression and strength of divergent screws mounted on miniplates and dynamic compression plate in fixation of mandibular body fractures: an in vitro study. Aghdashi F; Forouzmehr A; Nahvi G; Tabrizi R; Jafarian M; Majdi S Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 58(10):e260-e264. PubMed ID: 32811725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of compression and strength of divergent screws mounted on miniplates for fixation of mandibular fractures: an in vitro experimental study. Jafarian M; Pourdanesh F; Esmaeelinejad M; Dehghani N; Aghdashi F; Tabrizi R Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 53(7):613-7. PubMed ID: 25921364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model. Shetty V; McBrearty D; Fourney M; Caputo AA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Jul; 53(7):791-801; discussion 801-2. PubMed ID: 7595794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: in vitro biomechanical assessments and computer-based studies. Chrcanovic BR Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):251-68. PubMed ID: 23064805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of different mandibular fracture patterns on the stability of miniplate screw fixation in angle mandibular fractures. Pektas ZO; Bayram B; Balcik C; Develi T; Uckan S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 41(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 22178275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle. Ellis E Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Aug; 28(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 10416889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1109-14. PubMed ID: 20655176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fracture healing and subimplant bone response following fixation with a locking miniplate and screw system for mandibular angle fractures in a sheep model. Poon CC; Verco S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 23374732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of different types of rigid internal fixation techniques for subcondylar fractures. Tominaga K; Habu M; Khanal A; Mimori Y; Yoshioka I; Fukuda J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1510-6. PubMed ID: 16982310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible. Hakim SG; Wolf M; Wendlandt R; Kimmerle H; Sieg P; Jacobsen HC Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24629455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of polymethylmethacrylate on the stability of screw fixation in mandibular angle fractures: A study on sheep mandibles. Cankaya AB; Kasapoglu MB; Erdem MA; Kasapoglu C Int J Med Sci; 2018; 15(13):1466-1471. PubMed ID: 30443166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of parasymphyseal fracture fixation in edentulous patients performed using dynamic navigation systems and Herbert screws with the conventional two-plate method: A study on models. Demetoglu U; Bilge S J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 122(4):e39-e44. PubMed ID: 33493686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative in vitro mechanical evaluation of techniques using a 2.0 mm locking fixation system for simulated fractures of the mandibular body. de Medeiros RC; de Moura AL; Sawazaki R; Fernandes Moreira RW J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 25573304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fixation stability of resorbable versus titanium plate and screws in mandibular angle fractures. Bayram B; Araz K; Uckan S; Balcik C J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1644-8. PubMed ID: 19615576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of a new design titanium miniplate for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Suer BT; Kocyigit ID; Kaman S; Tuz HH; Tekin U; Atil F Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(7):841-5. PubMed ID: 24582290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of intermaxillary fixation screws and noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular fractures: a prospective clinical study. Anslem O; Eyituoyo O; Olabode OV; Ademola OA; Adesina AO Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):233-240. PubMed ID: 28386782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of titanium, biodegradable plate and screw, and cyanoacrylate glue fixation systems in craniofacial surgery. Gosain AK; Song L; Corrao MA; Pintar FA Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Mar; 101(3):582-91. PubMed ID: 9500375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of screw placement on plate strain in 3.5 mm dynamic compression plates and limited-contact dynamic compression plates. Maxwell M; Horstman CL; Crawford RL; Vaughn T; Elder S; McLaughlin R Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 19290393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can monocortical miniplates provide bony compression?. An experimental model. Kerawala CJ; Allan W; Williams ED Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 41(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 12946664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]