181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3281177)
1. Recognition of disoriented shapes.
Corballis MC
Psychol Rev; 1988 Jan; 95(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 3281177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes.
Jolicoeur P
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 May; 16(2):351-64. PubMed ID: 2142204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The structure of memory: evidence concerning the recall of surface and background color of shapes.
Wilton RN
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Aug; 41(3):579-98. PubMed ID: 2798923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of intertrial interval, orientation, and adaptation on orientation discrimination measured with a yes-no signal detection paradigm.
Valle V; Rivera RM; Matin E
Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Dec; 59(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 6522190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recognition of altered shapes by hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
Chen KC; Chen MT
J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jan; 117(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 2313277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.
Valentine T; Bruce V
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1986 Apr; 61(3):259-73. PubMed ID: 3716859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Facilitation of free recall by categorical blocking depends on stimulus type.
Gollin ES; Sharps MJ
Mem Cognit; 1988 Nov; 16(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 3193885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of symmetry and contour on recognition memory in children.
Mendelson MJ; Lee SP
J Exp Child Psychol; 1981 Dec; 32(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 7320675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of stimulus change: the hypothetical roles of visual transient responses.
Stelmach LB; Bourassa CM; Di Lollo V
Percept Psychophys; 1984 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 6728623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Children's memory for line orientation: a reexamination of the "oblique effect".
Fisher CB
J Exp Child Psychol; 1980 Jun; 29(3):446-59. PubMed ID: 7373214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Processing global information in briefly presented pictures.
Antes JR; Penland JG; Metzger RL
Psychol Res; 1981; 43(3):277-92. PubMed ID: 7323243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recognition of upright and inverted faces: a correlational study.
Phillips RJ; Rawles RE
Perception; 1979; 8(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 503787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation.
Jolicoeur P; Milliken B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 2522510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of spatial separation of stimuli on children's discrimination learning.
Etaugh CF; Pope BK
Child Dev; 1974 Dec; 45(4):1170-2. PubMed ID: 4143875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of slant-in-depth is automatic.
Epstein W; Babler T
Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jan; 45(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 2913567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential acquisition rates for different types of information from pictures.
Loftus GR; Nelson WW; Kallman HJ
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1983 Feb; 35(Pt 1):187-98. PubMed ID: 6681183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of set size on hemifield asymmetries in letter recognition.
Miller LK; Butler D
Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 7363074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition.
Tarr MJ; Pinker S
Cogn Psychol; 1989 Apr; 21(2):233-82. PubMed ID: 2706928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Regression to egocentrically determined description of form under conditions of inattention.
Rock I; Nijhawan R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 May; 15(2):259-72. PubMed ID: 2525599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.
Bonanno GA; Stillings NA
Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(3):403-15. PubMed ID: 3799851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
