These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3281177)
21. Perceptual integration of motion and form information: is the movement filter involved in form discrimination? Müller HJ; Maxwell J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):397-420. PubMed ID: 8189201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visual inhomogeneity and eye movements in multistable perception. García-Pérez MA Percept Psychophys; 1989 Oct; 46(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 2798035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. Palmer J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 May; 16(2):332-50. PubMed ID: 2142203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Very young children are insensitive to picture- but not object-orientation. Pierroutsakos SL; Deloache JS; Gound M; Bernard EN Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15985066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Biederman I Psychol Rev; 1987 Apr; 94(2):115-147. PubMed ID: 3575582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The effects of anteromedial cortex lesions on pattern discrimination learning in rat. Christie D; Russell IS Behav Brain Res; 1989 Nov; 35(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 2818833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Form perception at birth: Cohen and Younger (1984) revisited. Slater A; Mattock A; Brown E; Bremner JG J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Jun; 51(3):395-406. PubMed ID: 2072083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three-dimensionality and discriminability in the object-superiority effect. Enns JT; Gilani AB Percept Psychophys; 1988 Sep; 44(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 3174356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Monocular pattern alternation: effects of mean luminance and contrast. Kitterle FL; Kaye RS Percept Psychophys; 1984 Oct; 36(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 6522235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Children's recognition of reversals of geometric figures. Stein NL; Mandler JM Child Dev; 1974 Sep; 45(3):604-15. PubMed ID: 4143816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Is time to scan visual images due to demand characteristics? Jolicoeur P; Kosslyn SM Mem Cognit; 1985 Jul; 13(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 4079748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reassessing the automaticity-control distinction: item recognition as a paradigm case. Ryan C Psychol Rev; 1983 Apr; 90(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 6867218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Effect of conditioned stimuli on learning and recognition]. Grabitz HJ; Wittmann B; Hammerl M Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1986; 138(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 3579547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Generalization after form discrimination in light-reared and dark-reared rats. Tees RC; Midgley G; Nesbit JC Dev Psychobiol; 1982 Mar; 15(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 7095283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spatial attention in vision. Evidence for early selection. Hoffman JE Psychol Res; 1986; 48(4):221-9. PubMed ID: 3602255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Changes in the reference system exemplified by a visual assessment task]. Junghanns G; Ullsperger P; Metz AM Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1988; 196(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 2906773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Iconic memory for elementary visual characteristics: on a poorly accessible visual store and the long-lasting icon]. Schulz T Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1981-1982; 134(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 7347590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]