These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32812098)
1. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Schimmel M; Akino N; Srinivasan M; Wittneben JG; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 32812098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning of Edentulous Jaws with and without Resin Markers. Tao C; Zhao YJ; Sun YC; Heng MD; Xie QF; Pan SX Chin J Dent Res; 2020; 23(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 33491358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study. Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study. Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws]. Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Different Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Bite Registration in Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Arches. Rutkūnas V; Jegelevičius D; Gedrimienė A; Auškalnis L; Eyüboğlu TF; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Akulauskas M; Pletkus J J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105050. PubMed ID: 38735468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model]. Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoral Scans of Full Dental Arches: An In Vitro Measurement Study of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners. Giuliodori G; Rappelli G; Aquilanti L Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study. Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. Braian M; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. Osman RB; Alharbi NM J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of scanning protocol on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study. Hamilton A; Negreiros WM; Jain S; Finkelman M; Gallucci GO Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jun; 35(6):641-651. PubMed ID: 38567801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study. Al Hamad KQ; Al-Kaff FT J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 35997079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: An in vitro study. Jamjoom FZ; Aldghim A; Aldibasi O; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 36841708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols. Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. Imburgia M; Logozzo S; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Mangano C; Mangano FG BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28577366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study. Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño Santos A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 34453466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]