117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32812125)
1. Automatic measurement of mandibular cortical bone width on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Mizukuchi T; Naitoh M; Hishikawa T; Nishida S; Mitani A; Ariji E; Koyama S
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 32812125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of cone beam computed tomography in identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Brasileiro CB; Chalub LLFH; Abreu MHNG; Barreiros ID; Amaral TMP; Kakehasi AM; Mesquita RA
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):26. PubMed ID: 28265896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of the computed tomography indices on cone beam computed tomography images in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in women.
Koh KJ; Kim KA
Imaging Sci Dent; 2011 Sep; 41(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 22010066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Osteoporosis detection using cone-beam computed tomography].
Geibel MA; Löffler F; Kildal D
Orthopade; 2016 Dec; 45(12):1066-1071. PubMed ID: 27681530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital panoramic radiography and CBCT as auxiliary tools for detection of low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women: a cross-sectional study.
Abdinian M; Milaei M; Soltani P
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):78. PubMed ID: 37308822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of cone beam computed tomography radiomorphometric analysis and fractal dimension in assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in correlation with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Mostafa RA; Arnout EA; Abo El-Fotouh MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160212. PubMed ID: 27418348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new cone-beam computed tomography-driven index for osteoporosis prediction.
de Castro JGK; Carvalho BF; de Melo NS; de Souza Figueiredo PT; Moreira-Mesquita CR; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Jacobs R; Leite AF
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Sep; 24(9):3193-3202. PubMed ID: 31912243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of chronic renal failure with cone beam computed tomography radiomorphometric indices and fractal analysis in the mandible.
Ersu N; Şirin Sarıbal G; Tanyeri FZ; Amuk M
Oral Radiol; 2023 Jan; 39(1):133-142. PubMed ID: 35484445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study.
Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Yüksel SP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of mandibular index values determined from standard panoramic versus cone beam computed tomography reconstructed images.
Koseoglu Secgin C; Gulsahi A; Yavuz Y; Kamburoglu K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Mar; 127(3):257-264. PubMed ID: 30497908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the mandibular index on panoramic and cross-sectional images from CBCT exams from osteoporosis risk group.
Gomes CC; de Rezende Barbosa GL; Bello RP; Bóscolo FN; de Almeida SM
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Jul; 25(7):1885-90. PubMed ID: 24676849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular cortical indices on cone-beam computed tomography images in osteoporotic women on treatment with oral bisphosphonates.
Diniz-Freitas M; Fernández-Montenegro P; Fernández-Feijoo J; Limeres-Posse J; González-Mosquera A; Vázquez-García E; Diz-Dios P
Gerodontology; 2016 Jun; 33(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 24698332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of experimental phantoms to determine the accuracy and reliability of mandibular cortical width measurements by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Hayashi Y; Ito M; Imanishi Y; Watanabe K; Matsumoto K; Arai Y; Honda K
J Oral Sci; 2020 Jun; 62(3):303-307. PubMed ID: 32522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the potential of automatic segmentation of the mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography.
Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Kroon DJ; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 52(9):838-44. PubMed ID: 25156043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal sites for mini-implant insertion in the lingual or palatal alveolar cortical bone as assessed by cone beam computed tomography in South Indian population.
Mallick S; Murali PS; Kuttappa MN; Shetty P; Nair A
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 32749047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients.
Elshebiny T; Palomo JM; Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):505-511. PubMed ID: 29602342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and osteometric examination in preoperative assessment of the proximity of the mandibular canal to the apices of the teeth.
Adibi S; Paknahad M
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 55(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 27842729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandibular radiomorphometric measurements as indicators of possible osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Vlasiadis KZ; Skouteris CA; Velegrakis GA; Fragouli I; Neratzoulakis JM; Damilakis J; Koumantakis EE
Maturitas; 2007 Nov; 58(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 17923346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Three-dimensional survey of the whole mandibular canal and mandibular morphology by cone beam computed tomography in normal young people].
Sheng L; Qu W; Li Y; Qu Z; Wang J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 34(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 27337924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
