These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32812386)

  • 1. A systematic review of internet-based information on dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
    Haque A; Cox M; Sandler RD; Hughes M
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 32812386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic review of internet-based information for individuals with Raynaud's phenomenon and patients with systemic sclerosis.
    Devgire V; Martin AF; McKenzie L; Sandler RD; Hughes M
    Clin Rheumatol; 2020 Aug; 39(8):2363-2367. PubMed ID: 32152916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High tibial osteotomy: A review of the readability and quality of patient information on the internet.
    Clark M; Baxter IC; Hampton M; Sandler RD; Legg A
    Health Promot Perspect; 2021; 11(3):323-328. PubMed ID: 34660227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readability, understandability, and quality of retinopathy of prematurity information on the web.
    Yılmaz FH; Tutar MS; Arslan D; Çeri A
    Birth Defects Res; 2021 Jul; 113(12):901-910. PubMed ID: 33594835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How understandable are the patient education materials about flat foot on the Internet for parents?
    Çiftci S; Şahin E; Aktaş SA; Safali S; Durgut F; Aydin BK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32791. PubMed ID: 36820566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis.
    Jo JH; Kim EJ; Kim JR; Kim MJ; Chung JW; Park JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Mar; 125(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 29325852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
    Vågenes H; Pranić SM
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
    Awal DH; Mills C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
    Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
    Hassan AK; Eleiwa TK; Hassan MA; Sallam AB; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Gise R; Phillips PH; Elhusseiny AM
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and Readability Analysis of Turbinoplasty on the Web.
    Davis WT; DeShazo S; Rossi N; Pine H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39221958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
    Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
    Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.