BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32812514)

  • 1. Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management value chain: A case study from Pakistan.
    Atta U; Hussain M; Malik RN
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Dec; 38(12):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 32812514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management options using life cycle assessment: a case study.
    Yadav P; Samadder SR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(1):838-854. PubMed ID: 29063409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran.
    Rouhi K; Shafiepour Motlagh M; Dalir F
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Dec; 73(12):890-901. PubMed ID: 37843987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative life cycle analysis of municipal waste management systems: Kırklareli/Turkey case study.
    Özer B; Yay ASE
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(45):63867-63877. PubMed ID: 33492597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sustainable municipal waste management strategies through life cycle assessment method: A review.
    Zhang J; Qin Q; Li G; Tseng CH
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112238. PubMed ID: 33714044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.
    Jeswani HK; Azapagic A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():346-63. PubMed ID: 26906085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of municipal solid waste collection routes in a Latin-American context.
    Benitez-Bravo R; Gomez-González R; Rivas-García P; Botello-Álvarez JE; Huerta-Guevara OF; García-León AM; Rueda-Avellaneda JF
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Nov; 71(11):1415-1427. PubMed ID: 34269639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The life cycle approach for assessing the impact of municipal solid waste incineration on the environment and on human health.
    Di Maria F; Mastrantonio M; Uccelli R
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 776():145785. PubMed ID: 33647657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic analysis and life cycle impact assessment of municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal: A case study of Mumbai, India.
    Mehta YD; Shastri Y; Joseph B
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Dec; 36(12):1177-1189. PubMed ID: 30112976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Municipal Solid Waste Management through Sustainable Landfilling: In View of the Situation in Karachi, Pakistan.
    Sohoo I; Ritzkowski M; Guo J; Sohoo K; Kuchta K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35055594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity analysis and improvements of the recycling rate in municipal solid waste life cycle assessment: Focus on a Latin American developing context.
    Ferronato N; Moresco L; Guisbert Lizarazu GE; Gorritty Portillo MA; Conti F; Torretta V
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jun; 128():1-15. PubMed ID: 33957429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis and forecasting of municipal solid waste in Nankana City using geo-spatial techniques.
    Mahmood S; Sharif F; Rahman AU; Khan AU
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Apr; 190(5):275. PubMed ID: 29644486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of environmental impacts related to municipal solid waste and construction and demolition waste management and recycling in a Latin American developing city.
    Ferronato N; Moresco L; Guisbert Lizarazu GE; Gorritty Portillo MA; Conti F; Torretta V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(4):8548-8562. PubMed ID: 34677771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste management in Pakistan.
    Michel Devadoss PS; Pariatamby A; Bhatti MS; Chenayah S; Shahul Hamid F
    Waste Manag Res; 2021 Jul; 39(7):914-927. PubMed ID: 33506744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An economic evaluation and assessment of environmental impact of the municipal solid waste management system for Taichung City in Taiwan.
    Chang YJ; Chu CW; Lin MD
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 May; 62(5):527-40. PubMed ID: 22696803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental performance evolution of municipal solid waste management by life cycle assessment in Hangzhou, China.
    Zhou Z; Tang Y; Dong J; Chi Y; Ni M; Li N; Zhang Y
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Dec; 227():23-33. PubMed ID: 30172156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management options in Hohhot, People's Republic of China.
    Liu M; Tan Z; Fan X; Chang Y; Wang L; Yin X
    Waste Manag Res; 2021 Jan; 39(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 32972328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Closing the gap in the municipal solid waste management between metropolitan and regional cities from developing countries: A life cycle assessment approach.
    Espinoza Pérez L; Ziegler-Rodríguez K; Espinoza Pérez AT; Vásquez ÓC; Vázquez-Rowe I
    Waste Manag; 2021 Apr; 124():314-324. PubMed ID: 33647557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of municipal solid waste in African cities for thermochemical waste-to-energy conversion: The case of Harare Metropolitan City, Zimbabwe.
    Makarichi L; Kan R; Jutidamrongphan W; Techato KA
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Jan; 37(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 30355247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Status, characterization, and potential utilization of municipal solid waste as renewable energy source: Lahore case study in Pakistan.
    Azam M; Jahromy SS; Raza W; Raza N; Lee SS; Kim KH; Winter F
    Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105291. PubMed ID: 31730999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.