163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3281317)
1. [The Dalkon shield. The infamous intrauterine device].
Sandvei R; Bergsjø P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1988 Jan; 108(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 3281317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term study of the safety of the Dalkon Shield and Gyne-T 200 intrauterine devices.
Rioux JE; Cloutier D; Dupont P; Lamonde D
CMAJ; 1986 Apr; 134(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 3948091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Dalkon Shield debate.
Goodhue PA
Conn Med; 1983 Mar; 47(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 6851548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Dalkon Shield.
FDA Consum; 1975 Feb; 9(1):21. PubMed ID: 10308671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.
Mumford SD; Kessel E
Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Dalkon Shield controversy. Structural and bacteriological studies of IUD tails.
Tatum HJ; Schmidt FH; Phillips D; McCarty M; O'Leary WM
JAMA; 1975 Feb; 231(7):711-7. PubMed ID: 1172860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Letter: Dalkon shield and septic abortion.
Briggs MH
Med J Aust; 1975 Jan; 1(3):81. PubMed ID: 1128373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Editorial: The end of the Dalkon shield.
Med J Aust; 1975 Oct; 2(14):542. PubMed ID: 1196208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An association between the Dalkon Shield and complicated pregnancies among women hospitalized for intrauterine contraceptive device--related disorders.
Kahn HS; Tyler CW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 125(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 1275008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.
Lee NC; Rubin GL; Ory HW; Burkman RT
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul; 62(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 6856209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems.
Sivin I
Contraception; 1993 Jul; 48(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8403900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Letter: Intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Watson DS
Med J Aust; 1974 May; 1(20):811. PubMed ID: 4852831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postmenopausal bleeding secondary to a Dalkon Shield retained for 33 years: a case report.
Sozen I; Morgan K; Shannon JS
J Reprod Med; 2005 Mar; 50(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 15841937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perforation of the large bowel by a Dalkon Shield intrauterine device.
Athari TA; Pizarro C
J Reprod Med; 1976 Dec; 17(6):331-2. PubMed ID: 1003399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of PID 5x greater from Dalkon Shield than from other IUDs.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):225-6. PubMed ID: 6653739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Dalkon Shield IUD.
International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
IPPF Med Bull; 1980 Dec; 14(6):3. PubMed ID: 12310088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The rise and fall and rise of the IUD.
Burnhill MS
Am J Gynecol Health; 1989; 3(3-S):6-10. PubMed ID: 12285000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical records in litigation: the Dalkon Shield story.
Byrne K
AMRO; 1992 Feb; 32(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 10117045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current assessment of the use of intrauterine devices.
Westhoff CL
J Nurse Midwifery; 1996; 41(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 8708805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
