These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32813647)

  • 1. Corrections to "Design and Integration of a Parallel, Soft Robotic End-Effector for Extracorporeal Ultrasound".
    Lindenroth L; Housden RJ; Wang S; Back J; Rhode K; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Sep; 67(9):2707. PubMed ID: 32813647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bio-inspired approach for the design of a multifunctional robotic end-effector customized for automated maintenance of a reconfigurable vibrating screen.
    Makinde OA; Mpofu K; Vrabic R; Ramatsetse BI
    Robotics Biomim; 2017; 4(1):4. PubMed ID: 28932653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic ultrasound systems in medicine.
    Priester AM; Natarajan S; Culjat MO
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Mar; 60(3):507-23. PubMed ID: 23475917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positional calibration of an ultrasound image-guided robotic breast biopsy system.
    Nelson TR; Tran A; Fakourfar H; Nebeker J
    J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Mar; 31(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 22368125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Architecture and design of a robotic mastication simulator for interactive load testing of dental implants and the mandible.
    Tahir AM; Jilich M; Trinh DC; Cannata G; Barberis F; Zoppi M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Oct; 122(4):389.e1-389.e8. PubMed ID: 31547954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the reproducibility of expert-operated and robotic ultrasound acquisitions.
    Kojcev R; Khakzar A; Fuerst B; Zettinig O; Fahkry C; DeJong R; Richmon J; Taylor R; Sinibaldi E; Navab N
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jun; 12(6):1003-1011. PubMed ID: 28321804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric evaluation of a "virtual" image-guidance alternative to explicit 6 degree of freedom robotic couch correction.
    Sarkar V; Wang B; Hinkle J; Gonzalez VJ; Hitchcock YJ; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Joshi S; Salter BJ
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2012; 2(2):122-37. PubMed ID: 24674088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motion control skill assessment based on kinematic analysis of robotic end-effector movements.
    Liang K; Xing Y; Li J; Wang S; Li A; Li J
    Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 28660644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental study on restricting the robotic end-effector inside a lesion for safe telesurgery.
    Jang J; Kim HW; So BR; Kim YS
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015; 24(6):317-25. PubMed ID: 25921599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of an end-effector for robot-assisted ultrasound-guided breast biopsies.
    Welleweerd MK; Siepel FJ; Groenhuis V; Veltman J; Stramigioli S
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Apr; 15(4):681-690. PubMed ID: 32100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of High-Performance Soft Robotic Fish by Numerical Coupling Analysis.
    Zhao W; Ming A; Shimojo M
    Appl Bionics Biomech; 2018; 2018():5697408. PubMed ID: 30598697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Biologically Inspired, Functionally Graded End Effector for Soft Robotics Applications.
    Kumar K; Liu J; Christianson C; Ali M; Tolley MT; Aizenberg J; Ingber DE; Weaver JC; Bertoldi K
    Soft Robot; 2017 Dec; 4(4):317-323. PubMed ID: 29251563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra-operative feedback and dynamic compensation for image-guided robotic focal ultrasound surgery.
    Chauhan S; Amir H; Chen G; Hacker A; Michel MS; Koehrmann KU
    Comput Aided Surg; 2008 Nov; 13(6):353-68. PubMed ID: 19085235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the Kinect to limit abnormal kinematics and compensation strategies during therapy with end effector robots.
    Brokaw EB; Lum PS; Cooper RA; Brewer BR
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650384. PubMed ID: 24187203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and modeling of a high-load soft robotic gripper inspired by biological winding.
    Li H; Yao J; Zhou P; Zhao W; Xu Y; Zhao Y
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2020 Feb; 15(2):026006. PubMed ID: 31822642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A propensity score matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted sigmoidectomy in an enhanced recovery pathway.
    Al Natour RH; Obias V; Albright J; Wu J; Ferraro J; Akram WM; McClure AM; Shanker BA; Cleary RK
    J Robot Surg; 2019 Oct; 13(5):649-656. PubMed ID: 30536133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Wink to grasp" - comparing eye, voice & EMG gesture control of grasp with soft-robotic gloves.
    Noronha B; Dziemian S; Zito GA; Konnaris C; Faisal AA
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1043-1048. PubMed ID: 28813959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modular force approximating soft robotic pneumatic actuator.
    Taylor AJ; Montayre R; Zhao Z; Kwok KW; Tse ZTH
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Nov; 13(11):1819-1827. PubMed ID: 30088209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Twining plant inspired pneumatic soft robotic spiral gripper with a fiber optic twisting sensor.
    Yang M; Cooper LP; Liu N; Wang X; Fok MP
    Opt Express; 2020 Nov; 28(23):35158-35167. PubMed ID: 33182967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward a Common Framework for the Design of Soft Robotic Manipulators with Fluidic Actuation.
    Garriga-Casanovas A; Collison I; Rodriguez Y Baena F
    Soft Robot; 2018 Oct; 5(5):622-649. PubMed ID: 30161015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.