These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32813819)

  • 1. The impact of vocal tuning in the perceptual auditory judgment of normal and deviated voice qualities.
    Takishima M; Gielow I; Madazio G; Behlau M
    Codas; 2020; 32(4):e20190135. PubMed ID: 32813819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.
    Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Fernandes ACN; de Souza Medved DM; da Silva EM; Júnior FB
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):774.e1-774.e8. PubMed ID: 28318969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between Voice and Auditory Processing.
    Ramos JS; Feniman MR; Gielow I; Silverio KCA
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):771.e25-771.e36. PubMed ID: 28967586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Widespread auditory deficits in tune deafness.
    Jones JL; Zalewski C; Brewer C; Lucker J; Drayna D
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 19125028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
    de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Study of the Effect of Experience on Auditory Processing Abilities in Voice Therapists and Other Speech-Language Pathologist in Auditory Perceptual Judgment of Voice.
    Alijanpour N; Jafarzadeh Bejestani S; Hajebi Khaniki S; Tarameshlu M; Ghaemi H
    J Voice; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38218687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
    Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of pitch matching significantly improved by live voice model.
    Granot RY; Israel-Kolatt R; Gilboa A; Kolatt T
    J Voice; 2013 May; 27(3):390.e13-20. PubMed ID: 23528675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual-Auditory and Acoustical Analysis of the Voices of Transgender Women.
    Schwarz K; Fontanari AMV; Costa AB; Soll BMB; da Silva DC; de Sá Villas-Bôas AP; Cielo CA; Bastilha GR; Ribeiro VV; Dorfman MEKY; Lobato MIR
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):602-608. PubMed ID: 28965663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires?
    Bamiou DE; Iliadou VV; Zanchetta S; Spyridakou C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):824-37. PubMed ID: 26554488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pitch and Duration Pattern Sequence Tests in 7- to 11-Year-Old Children: Results Depend on Response Mode.
    Balen SA; Moore DR; Sameshima K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 30461390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
    Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
    Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual and Acoustic Analyses of Good Voice Quality in Male Radio Performers.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Ternström S; Yiu E; Heard R
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):259.e1-259.e12. PubMed ID: 27342753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Ordering and temporal resolution in professional singers and in well tuned and out of tune amateur singers].
    Ishii C; Arashiro PM; Desgualdo L
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 17180797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.