These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32813985)

  • 1. Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
    Kim DM; Kim TH; Kholinne E; Park JH; Shin MJ; Kim H; Park D; Jeon IH; Koh KH
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Sep; 48(11):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 32813985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction.
    Yeom JW; Kim DM; Lee JB; Ben H; Alahmadi BM; Park JH; Koh KH; Jeon IH
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Oct; 50(12):3308-3317. PubMed ID: 36041050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
    Manderle BJ; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Beletsky A; Nwachukwu BU; Nicholson GP; Bush-Joseph C; Romeo AA; Forsythe B; Cole BJ; Verma NN
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Dec; 48(14):3447-3453. PubMed ID: 33079576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability.
    Scanaliato JP; Green CK; Sandler AB; Hurley ET; Hettrich CM; Parnes N
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jan; 52(1):207-214. PubMed ID: 38164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Zeng GJ; Moorthy V; Hao Y; Tjoen Lie DT
    J ISAKOS; 2024 Aug; 9(4):592-597. PubMed ID: 38740267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Cvetanovich GL; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Nwachukwu BU; Cabarcas BC; Cole BJ; Forsythe B; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 May; 28(5):939-948. PubMed ID: 30685283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis.
    Puzzitiello RN; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Agarwalla A; Verma NN; Forsythe B
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Apr; 28(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 30713060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair.
    Haunschild ED; Gilat R; Fu MC; Tauro T; Huddleston HP; Yanke AB; Forsythe B; Verma NN; Cole BJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Dec; 48(14):3439-3446. PubMed ID: 33104397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of shoulder functional scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective study.
    Mukadam AA; Nayak S; Willems J; Pandey V
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Apr; 144(4):1693-1701. PubMed ID: 38386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of age and gender in rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state 2 years after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction.
    Ben H; Yeom JW; Kholinne E; Guo J; Park JY; Ryu SM; Koh KH; Jeon IH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2024 Apr; 32(4):1038-1048. PubMed ID: 38477103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds in Studies Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review.
    Lee AC; Gupta R; Kelly JD; Li X; Parisien RL
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jul; 52(9):2424-2432. PubMed ID: 38318661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal clinically important differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale pain scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Tashjian RZ; Shin J; Broschinsky K; Yeh CC; Martin B; Chalmers PN; Greis PE; Burks RT; Zhang Y
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1406-1411. PubMed ID: 32081634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retear bigger than preoperative tear size would lead to treatment failure after rotator cuff repair.
    Kim H; Kim DM; Kholinne E; Park JH; Lee ES; Alzahrani WM; Jeon IH; Koh KH
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 34411721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes Following Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Allograft.
    Evuarherhe A; Condron NB; Gilat R; Knapik DM; Patel S; Wagner KR; Garrigues GE; Romeo A; Verma N; Cole BJ
    Arthroscopy; 2022 May; 38(5):1444-1453.e1. PubMed ID: 34863902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How can we define clinically important improvement in pain scores after biceps tenodesis?
    Lu Y; Beletsky A; Chahla J; Patel BH; Verma NN; Cole BJ; Forsythe B
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Feb; 30(2):430-438. PubMed ID: 32593673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?
    Werner BC; Chang B; Nguyen JT; Dines DM; Gulotta LV
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2672-2681. PubMed ID: 27392769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction.
    Khan AZ; Vaughan AK; Aman ZS; Lazarus MD; Williams GR; Namdari S
    J Clin Med; 2024 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 38731077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.
    Alben MG; Gordon D; Gambhir N; Kim MT; Romeo PV; Rokito AS; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Jul; 31(7):2602-2614. PubMed ID: 36622420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Establishing minimal clinically important difference for the UCLA and ASES scores after rotator cuff repair.
    Malavolta EA; Yamamoto GJ; Bussius DT; Assunção JH; Andrade-Silva FB; Gracitelli MEC; Ferreira Neto AA
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 108(2):102894. PubMed ID: 33746073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state.
    Hao KA; Hones KM; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Burns MQ; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Simovitch RW; Schoch BS; King JJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Oct; 32(10):e516-e527. PubMed ID: 37178967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.