265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32814586)
1. Comparative analysis of the biomechanical behavior of two different design metaphyseal-fitting short stems using digital image correlation.
Tatani I; Megas P; Panagopoulos A; Diamantakos I; Nanopoulos P; Pantelakis S
Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Aug; 19(1):65. PubMed ID: 32814586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two metaphyseal-fitting (short) femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective randomized clinical trial with additional biomechanical testing and finite element analysis.
Tatani I; Panagopoulos A; Diamantakos I; Sakellaropoulos G; Pantelakis S; Megas P
Trials; 2019 Jun; 20(1):359. PubMed ID: 31208433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and in vitro validation of a simplified numerical model for the design of a biomimetic femoral stem.
Jetté B; Brailovski V; Simoneau C; Dumas M; Terriault P
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jan; 77():539-550. PubMed ID: 29069636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.
Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metaphyseal anchoring short stem hip arthroplasty provides a more physiological load transfer: a comparative finite element analysis study.
Yan SG; Chevalier Y; Liu F; Hua X; Schreiner A; Jansson V; Schmidutz F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 15(1):498. PubMed ID: 33121506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term clinical and radiological results of two different design metaphyseal fitting femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial.
Tatani I; Solou K; Panagopoulos A; Lakoumentas J; Kouzelis A; Megas P
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 May; 16(1):316. PubMed ID: 34001204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Full-field in vitro measurements and in silico predictions of strain shielding in the implanted femur after total hip arthroplasty.
Chanda S; Dickinson A; Gupta S; Browne M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Aug; 229(8):549-59. PubMed ID: 26112349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bionic reconstruction of tension trabeculae in short-stem hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis.
Ding Z; Wang J; Wang Y; Zhang X; Huan Y; Zhang D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Feb; 24(1):89. PubMed ID: 36732725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a PEEK Femoral TKA Implant Preserve Intact Femoral Surface Strains Compared With CoCr? A Preliminary Laboratory Study.
Rankin KE; Dickinson AS; Briscoe A; Browne M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2405-2413. PubMed ID: 27020431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The biomechanical effect of anteversion and modular neck offset on stress shielding for short-stem versus conventional long-stem hip implants.
Goshulak P; Samiezadeh S; Aziz MS; Bougherara H; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 26774671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoral stem incorporating a diamond cubic lattice structure: Design, manufacture and testing.
Jetté B; Brailovski V; Dumas M; Simoneau C; Terriault P
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jan; 77():58-72. PubMed ID: 28888934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of stemmed and nonstemmed hip replacement on stress distribution of proximal femur and implant.
Chen CM; Tsai WC; Lin SC; Tseng CS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Sep; 15():312. PubMed ID: 25257699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress shielding effect after total hip arthroplasty varies between combinations of stem design and stiffness-a comparing biomechanical finite element analysis.
Burchard R; Graw JA; Soost C; Schmitt J
Int Orthop; 2023 Aug; 47(8):1981-1987. PubMed ID: 37269400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How stiffness and distal interlocking of revision hip stems influence the femoral cortical strain pattern.
Ellenrieder M; Steinhauser E; Bader R; Mittelmeier W
J Orthop Sci; 2012 May; 17(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 22406866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interest of short implants in hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: comparative study "uncemented short" vs "cemented conventional" femoral stems.
Miladi M; Villain B; Mebtouche N; Bégué T; Aurégan JC
Int Orthop; 2018 Jul; 42(7):1669-1674. PubMed ID: 29761221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified metaphyseal-loading anterolaterally flared anatomic femoral stem: five- to nine-year prospective follow-up evaluation and results of three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kokubo Y; Uchida K; Oki H; Negoro K; Nagamune K; Kawaguchi S; Takeno K; Yayama T; Nakajima H; Sugita D; Yoshida A; Baba H
Artif Organs; 2013 Feb; 37(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 23009086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel design of hip-stem with reduced strain-shielding.
Loha T; Bhattacharya R; Pal B; Amis AA
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 May; 238(5):471-482. PubMed ID: 38644528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
