These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32814644)

  • 1. Comparison of PI-RADS Versions 2.0 and 2.1 for MRI-based Calculation of the Prostate Volume.
    Ghafoor S; Becker AS; Woo S; Causa Andrieu PI; Stocker D; Gangai N; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Acad Radiol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1548-1556. PubMed ID: 32814644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of prostate volume in mpMRI: comparison of the recommendations of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v2.1.
    Gündoğdu E; Emekli E
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2021 Jan; 27(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 33252339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
    Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2.1 and PI-RADS version 2 regarding interreader variability and diagnostic accuracy for transition zone prostate cancer.
    Xu L; Zhang G; Zhang D; Zhang X; Bai X; Yan W; Zhou Y; Zhou Z; Xiao Y; Jin Z; Sun H
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4133-4141. PubMed ID: 32918577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
    Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate Prostate Volumes from Manual Calculations-A Comparison of PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Measurement Techniques.
    An JY; Fowler KJ
    Acad Radiol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1557-1558. PubMed ID: 34078573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
    Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which measurement method should be used for prostate volume for PI-RADS? A comparison of ellipsoid and segmentation methods.
    Colvin R; Walker D; Hafron J; Seifman B; Nandalur S; Gangwish D; Nandalur KR
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():454-458. PubMed ID: 34562834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-Reader Variability Using PI-RADS v2 Versus PI-RADS v2.1: Most New Disagreement Stems from Scores 1 and 2.
    Beetz NL; Haas M; Baur A; Konietschke F; Roy A; Hamm CA; Rudolph MM; Shnayien S; Hamm B; Cash H; Asbach P; Penzkofer T
    Rofo; 2022 Aug; 194(8):852-861. PubMed ID: 35545106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology.
    Giannarini G; Girometti R; Crestani A; Rossanese M; Calandriello M; Cereser L; Bednarova S; Battistella C; Sioletic S; Zuiani C; Valotto C; Ficarra V
    Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():191-197. PubMed ID: 30273613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Consistency of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2: A Study on Six Prostate Radiologists with Different Experiences from Half a Year to 17 Years.
    Ke Z; Wang L; Min XD; Feng ZY; Kang Z; Zhang PP; Li BS; You HJ; Hou SC
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Jul; 131(14):1666-1673. PubMed ID: 29998885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate Volume Estimation on MRI: Accuracy and Effects of Ellipsoid and Bullet-Shaped Measurements on PSA Density.
    Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Di Fiore GA; Picchi SG; Di Stasi M; Verde F; Petretta M; Imbriaco M; Cuocolo R
    Acad Radiol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):e219-e226. PubMed ID: 32553281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of dynamic contrast enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging score of 3 in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 of peripheral zone].
    Wang W; Shao ZH; Huang XH; Xu Y; Feng X; Wang PJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):1002-1006. PubMed ID: 32294857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of Clinical History on Maximum PI-RADS Version 2 Score: A Six-Reader 120-Case Sham History Retrospective Evaluation.
    Shankar PR; Kaza RK; Al-Hawary MM; Masch WR; Curci NE; Mendiratta-Lala M; Sakala MD; Johnson TD; Davenport MS
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):158-163. PubMed ID: 29664338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deep Learning Reconstruction Enables Highly Accelerated Biparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate.
    Johnson PM; Tong A; Donthireddy A; Melamud K; Petrocelli R; Smereka P; Qian K; Keerthivasan MB; Chandarana H; Knoll F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):184-195. PubMed ID: 34877735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Negative Predictive Value of a PI-RADS Version 2 Score of 1 on Prostate MRI and the Factors Associated With a False-Negative MRI Study.
    Ma HY; Ahmed FS; Luk L; Martina LAP; Wenske S; Shaish H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):667-672. PubMed ID: 32755155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.