170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32814644)
1. Comparison of PI-RADS Versions 2.0 and 2.1 for MRI-based Calculation of the Prostate Volume.
Ghafoor S; Becker AS; Woo S; Causa Andrieu PI; Stocker D; Gangai N; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Acad Radiol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1548-1556. PubMed ID: 32814644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of prostate volume in mpMRI: comparison of the recommendations of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v2.1.
Gündoğdu E; Emekli E
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2021 Jan; 27(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 33252339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2.1 and PI-RADS version 2 regarding interreader variability and diagnostic accuracy for transition zone prostate cancer.
Xu L; Zhang G; Zhang D; Zhang X; Bai X; Yan W; Zhou Y; Zhou Z; Xiao Y; Jin Z; Sun H
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4133-4141. PubMed ID: 32918577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate Prostate Volumes from Manual Calculations-A Comparison of PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Measurement Techniques.
An JY; Fowler KJ
Acad Radiol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1557-1558. PubMed ID: 34078573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which measurement method should be used for prostate volume for PI-RADS? A comparison of ellipsoid and segmentation methods.
Colvin R; Walker D; Hafron J; Seifman B; Nandalur S; Gangwish D; Nandalur KR
Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():454-458. PubMed ID: 34562834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter-Reader Variability Using PI-RADS v2 Versus PI-RADS v2.1: Most New Disagreement Stems from Scores 1 and 2.
Beetz NL; Haas M; Baur A; Konietschke F; Roy A; Hamm CA; Rudolph MM; Shnayien S; Hamm B; Cash H; Asbach P; Penzkofer T
Rofo; 2022 Aug; 194(8):852-861. PubMed ID: 35545106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology.
Giannarini G; Girometti R; Crestani A; Rossanese M; Calandriello M; Cereser L; Bednarova S; Battistella C; Sioletic S; Zuiani C; Valotto C; Ficarra V
Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():191-197. PubMed ID: 30273613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Consistency of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2: A Study on Six Prostate Radiologists with Different Experiences from Half a Year to 17 Years.
Ke Z; Wang L; Min XD; Feng ZY; Kang Z; Zhang PP; Li BS; You HJ; Hou SC
Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Jul; 131(14):1666-1673. PubMed ID: 29998885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Volume Estimation on MRI: Accuracy and Effects of Ellipsoid and Bullet-Shaped Measurements on PSA Density.
Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Di Fiore GA; Picchi SG; Di Stasi M; Verde F; Petretta M; Imbriaco M; Cuocolo R
Acad Radiol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):e219-e226. PubMed ID: 32553281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effects of dynamic contrast enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging score of 3 in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 of peripheral zone].
Wang W; Shao ZH; Huang XH; Xu Y; Feng X; Wang PJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):1002-1006. PubMed ID: 32294857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Clinical History on Maximum PI-RADS Version 2 Score: A Six-Reader 120-Case Sham History Retrospective Evaluation.
Shankar PR; Kaza RK; Al-Hawary MM; Masch WR; Curci NE; Mendiratta-Lala M; Sakala MD; Johnson TD; Davenport MS
Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):158-163. PubMed ID: 29664338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep Learning Reconstruction Enables Highly Accelerated Biparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate.
Johnson PM; Tong A; Donthireddy A; Melamud K; Petrocelli R; Smereka P; Qian K; Keerthivasan MB; Chandarana H; Knoll F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):184-195. PubMed ID: 34877735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Negative Predictive Value of a PI-RADS Version 2 Score of 1 on Prostate MRI and the Factors Associated With a False-Negative MRI Study.
Ma HY; Ahmed FS; Luk L; Martina LAP; Wenske S; Shaish H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):667-672. PubMed ID: 32755155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
