138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32815237)
1. Comparison of novel two-port and conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery approaches for benign adnexal masses: The Bagli method.
Bağlı İ; Bademkıran H
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2272-2279. PubMed ID: 32815237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of pediatric and adolescent adnexal masses by gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.
Takeda A; Imoto S; Nakamura H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():66-71. PubMed ID: 25129151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and feasibility of a single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery during pregnancy.
Lee JH; Lee JR; Jee BC; Suh CS; Kim SH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):864-70. PubMed ID: 23850362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for management of adnexal masses during pregnancy.
Takeda A; Imoto S; Nakamura H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():28-34. PubMed ID: 25016552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic surgery of large adnexal masses (>12 cm): Single port or conventional?
Güngördük K; Gülseren V; Özdemir İA
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2023 Jul; 16(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 36793236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative Outcomes after Single-port Laparoscopic Removal of Adnexal Masses in Patients Referred to Gynecologic Oncology at a Large Academic Center.
Moulton LJ; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1136-1144. PubMed ID: 28673874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety.
Wang SY; Yin L; Guan XM; Xiao BB; Zhang Y; Delgado A
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(11):1305-10. PubMed ID: 27231167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Novel System for Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery: Preliminary Experience.
Freschi L; Pluchino N; Angioni S; Simi G; Ruggiero M; Cela V
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(5):454-60. PubMed ID: 27198919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single access laparoscopy for adnexal pathologies using a novel reusable port and curved instruments.
Mereu L; Angioni S; Melis GB; Mencaglia L
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Apr; 109(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 20070967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mini-Laparoscopy for Removal (Partial) of Adnexae at the Time of Hysterectomy.
Setúbal AG; Alves JS; Lavado O; Faria J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):201-202. PubMed ID: 27856389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for hysterectomy: long-term outcomes of abdominal incisional scar.
Demirayak G; Özdemir İA; Comba C; Aslan Çetin B; Aydogan Mathyk B; Yıldız M; Mihmanlı V; Karaca İ; Öztürk M; Güralp O
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):217-221. PubMed ID: 31347412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pregnancy-preserving Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Gynecologic Disease: A Case Series.
Xiao J; Fu K; Duan K; Wang J; Sunkara S; Guan X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1588-1597. PubMed ID: 32126300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.
Yim GW; Lee M; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
Surg Innov; 2013 Feb; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 22410390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery with a multichannel port using a wound retractor: is it safe and minimally scarring?
Yi SW
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Dec; 19(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 19694570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-port laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy of benign adnexal masses during pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.
Chen S; Zhang G; Hua K; Ding J
J Int Med Res; 2022 Oct; 50(10):3000605221128153. PubMed ID: 36314266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-Port Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy in Benign Adnexal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Schmitt A; Crochet P; Knight S; Tourette C; Loundou A; Agostini A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1083-1095. PubMed ID: 28705751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes.
Angioni S; Pontis A; Sedda F; Zampetoglou T; Cela V; Mereu L; Litta P
Onco Targets Ther; 2015; 8():1575-80. PubMed ID: 26170692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-Port Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in a Patient With Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.
Şendağ F; Peker N; Aydeniz EG; Akdemir A; Gündoğan S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):196-197. PubMed ID: 27480596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transumbilical versus lateral transabdominal removal of benign adnexal masses in laparoscopic surgery-A randomized trial.
Kilpiö O; Härkki PSM; Mentula MJ; Jokela RM; Pakarinen PI
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Nov; 218():49-54. PubMed ID: 28950190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
