217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32815564)
41. Superb microvascular imaging is a rational choice for accurate Bosniak classification of renal cystic masses.
Mu J; Mao Y; Li F; Xin X; Zhang S
Br J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 92(1099):20181038. PubMed ID: 31067075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Utility of ultrasound Angio-PLUS imaging for detecting blood flow in breast masses and comparison with color Doppler for differentiating benign from malignant masses.
Mohindra N; Jain N; Yadav S; Agrawal V; Mishra P; Mishra A; Agarwal G
Acta Radiol; 2023 Jun; 64(6):2087-2095. PubMed ID: 36890701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The diagnostic value of Superb Microvascular Imaging in identifying benign tumors of parotid gland.
Zhao L; Mao Y; Mu J; Zhao J; Li F; Zhang S; Xin X
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):107. PubMed ID: 32938423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Superb Microvascular Imaging Improves Detection of Vascularity in Indeterminate Renal Masses.
Leong JY; Wessner CE; Kramer MR; Forsberg F; Halpern EJ; Lyshchik A; Torkzaban M; Morris A; Byrne K; VanMeter M; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Eisenbrey JR
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Oct; 39(10):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 32309889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Diagnostic Value of 3D Power Doppler Ultrasound Combined With VOCAL in the Vascular Distribution of Breast Masses.
Wang H; Yan B; Yue L; He M; Liu Y; Li H
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 31053481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging.
Zhang X; Cheng F; Song X; Wang P; Tian S; Zhao X; Wang Q; Zhang M
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Oct; 13(10):7029-7040. PubMed ID: 37869333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of plasma cell mastitis with superb microvascular imaging.
Zhu YC; Zhang Y; Deng SH; Jiang Q; Shi XR; Feng LL
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 72(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 30636730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Superb Microvascular Imaging Technology Can Improve the Diagnostic Efficiency of the BI-RADS System.
Cai S; Wang H; Zhang X; Zhang L; Zhu Q; Sun Q; Li J; Jiang Y
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():634752. PubMed ID: 34249681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnostic Performance of Superb Microvascular Imaging and Other Sonographic Modalities in the Assessment of Lateral Epicondylosis.
Arslan S; Karahan AY; Oncu F; Bakdik S; Durmaz MS; Tolu I
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Mar; 37(3):585-593. PubMed ID: 28850740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Evaluation of Pediatric Graves Disease and Hashimoto Thyroiditis.
Bayramoglu Z; Kandemirli SG; Akyol Sarı ZN; Kardelen AD; Poyrazoglu S; Bas F; Darendeliler F; Adaletli I
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 May; 39(5):901-909. PubMed ID: 31705696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prediction of Molecular Subtypes Using Superb Microvascular Imaging and Shear Wave Elastography in Invasive Breast Carcinomas.
Kurt SA; Kayadibi Y; Saracoglu MS; Ozturk T; Korkmazer B; Cerit M; Velidedeoğlu M
Acad Radiol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 35659854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Seeing the unseen with superb microvascular imaging: Ultrasound depiction of normal dermis vessels.
Corvino A; Varelli C; Cocco G; Corvino F; Catalano O
J Clin Ultrasound; 2022 Jan; 50(1):121-127. PubMed ID: 34761407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Application of superb microvascular imaging in focal liver lesions].
Yang F; Liu CW; Xin XJ; Zhang S
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 43(9):959-967. PubMed ID: 34530580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of Superb Microvascular Imaging With Color Flow and Power Doppler Imaging of Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas.
Dubinsky TJ; Revels J; Wang S; Toia G; Sonneborn R; Hippe DS; Erpelding T
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Dec; 37(12):2915-2924. PubMed ID: 29683199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Role of 3D power Doppler ultrasound in the further characterization of suspicious breast masses.
Kupeli A; Kul S; Eyuboglu I; Oguz S; Mungan S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26724642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The value of superb microvascular imaging in differentiating benign renal mass from malignant renal tumor: a retrospective study.
Mao Y; Mu J; Zhao J; Zhao L; Xin X
Br J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 91(1082):20170601. PubMed ID: 29125337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [The role of ATA (2015) guidelines, superb microvascular imaging, and spectral Doppler in differentiation between malignant and benign thyroid nodules].
Li YH; Wen DH; Li CX; Li XJ; Xue G
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 31(15):1152-1156. PubMed ID: 29798347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Superb Microvascular Imaging for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A System Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chen SH; Xiang XZ; Che PF; Hu B; Shui DY; Zhao Y; Wang L
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jul; 42(7):1385-1399. PubMed ID: 36579829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography and Color Doppler Ultrasonography for Distinguishing Small Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From Fibroadenoma.
Yeo SH; Kim GR; Lee SH; Moon WK
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2135-2146. PubMed ID: 29424448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
