These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32816238)

  • 1. Using Response Times and Response Accuracy to Measure Fluency Within Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Wang S; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):600-629. PubMed ID: 32816238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling Learner Heterogeneity: A Mixture Learning Model With Responses and Response Times.
    Zhang S; Wang S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2339. PubMed ID: 30568609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A joint modeling framework of responses and response times to assess learning outcomes.
    Wang S; Zhang S; Shen Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):49-68. PubMed ID: 31165632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Penalized EM Algorithm to Infer Learning Trajectories in Latent Transition CDM.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):167-189. PubMed ID: 33449306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Development of a Multidimensional Diagnostic Assessment With Learning Tools to Improve 3-D Mental Rotation Skills.
    Wang S; Hu Y; Wang Q; Wu B; Shen Y; Carr M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():305. PubMed ID: 32174870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies.
    Ma W; Guo W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):370-392. PubMed ID: 30756389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multilevel logistic hidden Markov model for learning under cognitive diagnosis.
    Zhang S; Chang HH
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):408-421. PubMed ID: 31065938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Higher-Order Cognitive Diagnosis Model with Ordinal Attributes for Dichotomous Response Data.
    Ma W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):408-421. PubMed ID: 33434081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
    da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Person-Level Analysis of the Effect of Cognitive Loading by Question Difficulty and Question Time Intensity on Didactic Examination Fluency (Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff).
    Thompson JJ
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):229-242. PubMed ID: 30169332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling multiple problem-solving strategies and strategy shift in cognitive diagnosis for growth.
    Liao M; Jiao H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):20-51. PubMed ID: 35810361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.
    Klein Entink RH; Kuhn JT; Hornke LF; Fox JP
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 19271848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Chen Y; Culpepper S; Liang F
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):121-153. PubMed ID: 31927684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-Stage maximum likelihood estimation in the misspecified restricted latent class model.
    Wang S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):300-333. PubMed ID: 29080215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing Growth in a Diagnostic Classification Model Framework.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):963-990. PubMed ID: 30264183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Dependence Structures for Response Times in a Bayesian Framework.
    Klotzke K; Fox JP
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):649-672. PubMed ID: 31098935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.