These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32816242)
1. Augmenting physician examiner scoring in objective structured clinical examinations: including the standardized patient perspective. Roy M; Wojcik J; Bartman I; Smee S Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Mar; 26(1):313-328. PubMed ID: 32816242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of portrayal by standardized patients: results from four OSCE stations conducted for high stakes examinations. Baig LA; Beran TN; Vallevand A; Baig ZA; Monroy-Cuadros M BMC Med Educ; 2014 May; 14():97. PubMed ID: 24884744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners. Zimmermann P; Kadmon M GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc40. PubMed ID: 32685668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CARECOS study: Medical students' empathy as assessed with the CARE measure by examiners versus standardized patients during a formative Objective and Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) station. Dufayet L; Piot MA; Geoffroy PA; Oulès B; Petitjean-Brichant C; Peiffer-Smadja N; Bouzid D; Tran Dinh A; Mirault T; Faye A; Lemogne C; Ruszniewski P; Peyre H; Vodovar D Med Teach; 2024 Sep; 46(9):1187-1195. PubMed ID: 38285021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of first impressions on subsequent ratings within an OSCE station. Wood TJ; Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh D; Touchie C Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):969-983. PubMed ID: 27848171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Resident Self-Evaluation to Standardized Patient Evaluators in a Multi-Institutional Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Objectively Measuring Residents' Communication and Counseling Skills. Diaczok BJ; Brennan S; Levine D; Hilu R; Thati N; Kruer J; Ahsan S; McNally P; Pieper D Simul Healthc; 2020 Apr; 15(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 32044855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The consistency and uncertainty in examiners' definitions of pass/fail performance on OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) stations. Rothman AI; Blackmore D; Cohen R; Reznick R Eval Health Prof; 1996 Mar; 19(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 10186899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A student-initiated objective structured clinical examination as a sustainable cost-effective learning experience. Lee CB; Madrazo L; Khan U; Thangarasa T; McConnell M; Khamisa K Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1440111. PubMed ID: 29480155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Weighting checklist items and station components on a large-scale OSCE: is it worth the effort? Sandilands DD; Gotzmann A; Roy M; Zumbo BD; De Champlain A Med Teach; 2014 Jul; 36(7):585-90. PubMed ID: 24787530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess multiple physician competencies in postgraduate training. Jefferies A; Simmons B; Tabak D; McIlroy JH; Lee KS; Roukema H; Skidmore M Med Teach; 2007 Mar; 29(2-3):183-91. PubMed ID: 17701631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using standardized patients' marks in scoring postgraduate psychiatry OSCEs. Whelan P; Church L; Kadry K Acad Psychiatry; 2009; 33(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 19690114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of "standardized examinees" in a standardized-patient examination of clinical skills. Pangaro LN; Worth-Dickstein H; Macmillan MK; Klass DJ; Shatzer JH Acad Med; 1997 Nov; 72(11):1008-11. PubMed ID: 9387827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of physician examiners and trained assessors in a high-stakes OSCE setting. Humphrey-Murto S; Smee S; Touchie C; Wood TJ; Blackmore DE Acad Med; 2005 Oct; 80(10 Suppl):S59-62. PubMed ID: 16199459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating Medical Spanish Proficiency: A Comparison of Physician Assistant Student Self-Assessment to Standardized Patient and Expert Faculty Member Ratings. Lie DA; Forest CP; Richter-Lagha R J Physician Assist Educ; 2018 Sep; 29(3):162-166. PubMed ID: 30086122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of the inclusion of simulated patient ratings on the reliability of OSCE assessments under the borderline regression method. Homer M; Pell G Med Teach; 2009 May; 31(5):420-5. PubMed ID: 19142798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs. Yeates P; Cope N; Hawarden A; Bradshaw H; McCray G; Homer M Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 53(3):250-263. PubMed ID: 30575092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs. Harasym PH; Woloschuk W; Cunning L Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):617-32. PubMed ID: 17610034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can physician examiners overcome their first impression when examinee performance changes? Wood TJ; Pugh D; Touchie C; Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Oct; 23(4):721-732. PubMed ID: 29556923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Training students to serve as standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination is feasible: A mixed-methods study. Wu ML; Chao LF; Hung YT Nurse Educ Pract; 2024 Aug; 79():104069. PubMed ID: 39053150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can standardized patients replace physicians as OSCE examiners? McLaughlin K; Gregor L; Jones A; Coderre S BMC Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16504145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]