195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32816532)
21. Spermatogonial stem cells and progenitors are refractory to reprogramming to pluripotency by the transcription factors Oct3/4, c-Myc, Sox2 and Klf4.
Corbineau S; Lassalle B; Givelet M; Souissi-Sarahoui I; Firlej V; Romeo PH; Allemand I; Riou L; Fouchet P
Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(6):10050-10063. PubMed ID: 28052023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reprogramming induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of c-Myc for differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells.
Li HY; Chien Y; Chen YJ; Chen SF; Chang YL; Chiang CH; Jeng SY; Chang CM; Wang ML; Chen LK; Hung SI; Huo TI; Lee SD; Chiou SH
Biomaterials; 2011 Sep; 32(26):5994-6005. PubMed ID: 21658760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Using low-risk factors to generate non-integrated human induced pluripotent stem cells from urine-derived cells.
Wang L; Chen Y; Guan C; Zhao Z; Li Q; Yang J; Mo J; Wang B; Wu W; Yang X; Song L; Li J
Stem Cell Res Ther; 2017 Nov; 8(1):245. PubMed ID: 29096702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nuclear reprogramming of luminal-like breast cancer cells generates Sox2-overexpressing cancer stem-like cellular states harboring transcriptional activation of the mTOR pathway.
Corominas-Faja B; Cufí S; Oliveras-Ferraros C; Cuyàs E; López-Bonet E; Lupu R; Alarcón T; Vellon L; Iglesias JM; Leis O; Martín ÁG; Vazquez-Martin A; Menendez JA
Cell Cycle; 2013 Sep; 12(18):3109-24. PubMed ID: 23974095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Induced pluripotent stem cells from goat fibroblasts.
Song H; Li H; Huang M; Xu D; Gu C; Wang Z; Dong F; Wang F
Mol Reprod Dev; 2013 Dec; 80(12):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24123501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Generation of disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with different karyotypes of Down syndrome.
Mou X; Wu Y; Cao H; Meng Q; Wang Q; Sun C; Hu S; Ma Y; Zhang H
Stem Cell Res Ther; 2012 Apr; 3(2):14. PubMed ID: 22512921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screening of Human cDNA Library Reveals Two differentiation-Related Genes, HHEX and HLX, as Promoters of Early Phase Reprogramming toward Pluripotency.
Yamakawa T; Sato Y; Matsumura Y; Kobayashi Y; Kawamura Y; Goshima N; Yamanaka S; Okita K
Stem Cells; 2016 Nov; 34(11):2661-2669. PubMed ID: 27335261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Derivation, characterization and retinal differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells.
Mekala SR; Vauhini V; Nagarajan U; Maddileti S; Gaddipati S; Mariappan I
J Biosci; 2013 Mar; 38(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 23385820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An integrated systems biology approach identifies positive cofactor 4 as a factor that increases reprogramming efficiency.
Jo J; Hwang S; Kim HJ; Hong S; Lee JE; Lee SG; Baek A; Han H; Lee JI; Lee I; Lee DR
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Feb; 44(3):1203-15. PubMed ID: 26740582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. MicroRNA-302 increases reprogramming efficiency via repression of NR2F2.
Hu S; Wilson KD; Ghosh Z; Han L; Wang Y; Lan F; Ransohoff KJ; Burridge P; Wu JC
Stem Cells; 2013 Feb; 31(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 23136034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Generation of Human iPSCs by Episomal Reprogramming of Skin Fibroblasts and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.
Febbraro F; Chen M; Denham M
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2239():135-151. PubMed ID: 33226617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mechanism of Induction: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs).
Singh VK; Kumar N; Kalsan M; Saini A; Chandra R
J Stem Cells; 2015; 10(1):43-62. PubMed ID: 26665937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Expression of pluripotent stem cell reprogramming factors by prostate tumor initiating cells.
Bae KM; Su Z; Frye C; McClellan S; Allan RW; Andrejewski JT; Kelley V; Jorgensen M; Steindler DA; Vieweg J; Siemann DW
J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):2045-53. PubMed ID: 20303530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into epiblast stem cells.
Han DW; Greber B; Wu G; Tapia N; Araúzo-Bravo MJ; Ko K; Bernemann C; Stehling M; Schöler HR
Nat Cell Biol; 2011 Jan; 13(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 21131959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimal reprogramming factor stoichiometry increases colony numbers and affects molecular characteristics of murine induced pluripotent stem cells.
Tiemann U; Sgodda M; Warlich E; Ballmaier M; Schöler HR; Schambach A; Cantz T
Cytometry A; 2011 Jun; 79(6):426-35. PubMed ID: 21548079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. iPS cells reprogrammed from human mesenchymal-like stem/progenitor cells of dental tissue origin.
Yan X; Qin H; Qu C; Tuan RS; Shi S; Huang GT
Stem Cells Dev; 2010 Apr; 19(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 19795982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Emerging methods for preparing iPS cells.
Miyazaki S; Yamamoto H; Miyoshi N; Takahashi H; Suzuki Y; Haraguchi N; Ishii H; Doki Y; Mori M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Sep; 42(9):773-9. PubMed ID: 22826352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. c-MYC independent nuclear reprogramming favors cardiogenic potential of induced pluripotent stem cells.
Martinez-Fernandez A; Nelson TJ; Ikeda Y; Terzic A
J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2010 Feb; 3(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 20221419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Enhanced human somatic cell reprogramming efficiency by fusion of the MYC transactivation domain and OCT4.
Wang L; Huang D; Huang C; Yin Y; Vali K; Zhang M; Tang Y
Stem Cell Res; 2017 Dec; 25():88-97. PubMed ID: 29125994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The timing of retroviral silencing correlates with the quality of induced pluripotent stem cell lines.
Okada M; Yoneda Y
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2011 Feb; 1810(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 20965232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
