These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32817487)

  • 1. Deconstructing bias in social preferences reveals groupy and not-groupy behavior.
    Kranton R; Pease M; Sanders S; Huettel S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(35):21185-21193. PubMed ID: 32817487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reputations for treatment of outgroup members can prevent the emergence of political segregation in cooperative networks.
    Simpson B; Montgomery B; Melamed D
    Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7721. PubMed ID: 38001105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Political Self: How Identity Aligns Preferences With Epistemic Needs.
    Federico CM; Ekstrom PD
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jun; 29(6):901-913. PubMed ID: 29702034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of others' political affiliation are moderated by individual perceivers' own political attitudes.
    Wilson JP; Rule NO
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95431. PubMed ID: 24781819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social structure learning in human anterior insula.
    Lau T; Gershman SJ; Cikara M
    Elife; 2020 Feb; 9():. PubMed ID: 32067635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judging scandal: Standards or bias in politics.
    Solomon ED; Hackathorn JM; Crittendon D
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 29565221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epistemic spillovers: Learning others' political views reduces the ability to assess and use their expertise in nonpolitical domains.
    Marks J; Copland E; Loh E; Sunstein CR; Sharot T
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():74-84. PubMed ID: 30342868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for Taste: A Multi-Attribute Neurocomputational Model Explains the Neural Dynamics of Choices for Self and Others.
    Harris A; Clithero JA; Hutcherson CA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(37):7952-7968. PubMed ID: 30076214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social identity bias and communication network clustering interact to shape patterns of opinion dynamics.
    Steiglechner P; Smaldino PE; Moser D; Merico A
    J R Soc Interface; 2023 Dec; 20(209):20230372. PubMed ID: 38086404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When I equals we: exploring the relation between social and personal identity of extreme right-wing political party members.
    Baray G; Postmes T; Jetten J
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Dec; 48(Pt 4):625-47. PubMed ID: 19232156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polarizing Political Polls: How Visualization Design Choices Can Shape Public Opinion and Increase Political Polarization.
    Holder E; Bearfield CX
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Jan; 30(1):1446-1456. PubMed ID: 37871081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consequences of "minimal" group affiliations in children.
    Dunham Y; Baron AS; Carey S
    Child Dev; 2011; 82(3):793-811. PubMed ID: 21413937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Me, us, or them: who is more conformist? Perception of conformity and political orientation.
    Cavazza N; Mucchi-Faina A
    J Soc Psychol; 2008 Jun; 148(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18605181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Homophily and acrophily as drivers of political segregation.
    Goldenberg A; Abruzzo JM; Huang Z; Schöne J; Bailey D; Willer R; Halperin E; Gross JJ
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 7(2):219-230. PubMed ID: 36411346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes.
    Van Boven L; Judd CM; Sherman DK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):84-100. PubMed ID: 22545744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system.
    Pietraszewski D; Curry OS; Petersen MB; Cosmides L; Tooby J
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():24-39. PubMed ID: 25867997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Do Acquired Political Identities Influence Our Neural Processing toward Others within the Context of a Trust Game?
    Wu CT; Fan YT; Du YR; Yang TT; Liu HL; Yen NS; Chen SH; Hsung RM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():23. PubMed ID: 29456496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The political downside of dual identity: group identifications and religious political mobilization of Muslim minorities.
    Martinovic B; Verkuyten M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):711-30. PubMed ID: 24571398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.