These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32817537)

  • 1. The objectivity illusion and voter polarization in the 2016 presidential election.
    Schwalbe MC; Cohen GL; Ross LD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(35):21218-21229. PubMed ID: 32817537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. They Saw a Debate: Political Polarization Is Associated with Greater Multivariate Neural Synchrony When Viewing the Opposing Candidate Speak.
    Broom TW; Stahl JL; Ping EEC; Wagner DD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 35(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 35802592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How perceived polarization predicts attitude moralization (and vice versa): A four-wave longitudinal study during the 2020 U.S. election.
    D'Amore C; van Zomeren M; Koudenburg N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2024 Apr; 126(4):624-642. PubMed ID: 38386365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes.
    Van Boven L; Judd CM; Sherman DK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):84-100. PubMed ID: 22545744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Candidate preferences and expectations of election outcomes.
    Delavande A; Manski CF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(10):3711-5. PubMed ID: 22355121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 presidential election.
    Fazio RH; Williams CJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1986 Sep; 51(3):505-14. PubMed ID: 3761146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of Attitude toward the Public Health Spending and Its Relationship with Voting Behavior in the 2012 South Korean Presidential Election.
    Eun SJ; Lee JY; Jung HM; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163763. PubMed ID: 27711213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Political attitudes bias the mental representation of a presidential candidate's face.
    Young AI; Ratner KG; Fazio RH
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Feb; 25(2):503-10. PubMed ID: 24367060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual Disgust Trumps Pathogen Disgust in Predicting Voter Behavior During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Billingsley J; Lieberman D; Tybur JM
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918764170. PubMed ID: 29911419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testosterone fluctuations in response to a democratic election predict partisan attitudes toward the elected leader.
    Prasad S; Knight EL; Sarkar A; Welker KM; Lassetter B; Mehta PH
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2021 Nov; 133():105396. PubMed ID: 34508970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misperceptions in intergroup conflict. Disagreeing about what we disagree about.
    Chambers JR; Baron RS; Inman ML
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 16371142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in subjective well-being following the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez KA; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Tibbett T
    Emotion; 2019 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29494200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Vail KE; Harvell-Bowman L; Lockett M; Pyszczynski T; Gilmore G
    Motiv Emot; 2023; 47(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 36188156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Politicization as an antecedent of polarization: Evidence from two different political and national contexts.
    Simon B; Reininger KM; Schaefer CD; Zitzmann S; Krys S
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 58(4):769-785. PubMed ID: 30556187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The footprint of campaign strategies in Farsi Twitter: A case for 2021 Iranian presidential election.
    Mohammadi S; Moradi P; Firouzabadi SM; Jafari G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270822. PubMed ID: 35900976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using "Big Data" Versus Alternative Measures of Aggregate Data to Predict the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election.
    Ma-Kellams C; Bishop B; Zhang MF; Villagrana B
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Aug; 121(4):726-735. PubMed ID: 29298630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election.
    Lench HC; Fernandez L; Reed N; Raibley E; Levine LJ; Salsedo K
    Cogn Emot; 2024 May; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38764190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.