These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3281778)

  • 21. X-ray and fine-needle biopsy in diagnosis of non-palpable breast lesions.
    Hennig K; Johansson H; Rimsten A; Stenkvist B
    Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 1054209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer.
    Hicks MJ; Davis JR; Layton JM; Present AJ
    JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(19):2080-3. PubMed ID: 490787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration cytology.
    Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Bravetti P
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 2675190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Sensitivity of mammography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Ciarmiello G; Nunzi P; D'Annibale A; Tessarin N; Gualandi O; Furlanetto A
    Pathologica; 1990; 82(1078):155-60. PubMed ID: 2392337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Diagnosis of non-palpable breast lesions: contribution of cytological punctures after stereotaxic localization].
    Meunier M; Le Gal M; Klijanienko J; Vielh P; Neuenschwander S; Durand JC; Asselain B
    J Radiol; 1995 May; 76(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 7783038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical decision-making in atypical and suspicious categories in fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast.
    Gipponi M; Fregatti P; Garlaschi A; Calabrese M; Baccini P; Gallo M; Murelli F; Margarino C; Bobbio C; Friedman D
    Anticancer Res; 2015 Apr; 35(4):2369-74. PubMed ID: 25862902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic efficacy of the clinical-radiological-cytological triad in solid breast lumps: results of a second prospective study on 631 patients.
    Di Pietro S; Fariselli G; Bandieramonte G; Lepera P; Coopmans de Yoldi G; Viganotti G; Pilotti S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1987 Aug; 13(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 3305081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Diagnosis in early breast cancer].
    Tsuchiya A; Nakayama K; Urazumi K; Kimijima I; Abe R
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 Jun; 21 Suppl 2():148-52. PubMed ID: 8037477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The predictive value of three diagnostic procedures in the evaluation of palpable breast tumours.
    Crone P; Hertz J; Nilsson T; Junge J; Høier-Madsen K; Kennedy M; Bojsen-Møller J; Diepeveen P; Hahn-Pedersen A; Jørgensen SJ
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 6524859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of aspiration biopsy cytology and combined preoperative tests in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Nakayama K; Abe R; Kimijima I; Watanabe T; Furukawa Y; Suzuki S; Urazumi K; Tsuchiya A
    Surg Today; 1995; 25(5):404-8. PubMed ID: 7640467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnosing breast carcinoma in young women.
    Yelland A; Graham MD; Trott PA; Ford HT; Coombes RC; Gazet JC; Polson NG
    BMJ; 1991 Mar; 302(6777):618-20. PubMed ID: 2012873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammographically negative breast cancer at the Strathfield Breast Centre.
    Chew SB; Hughes M; Kennedy C; Gillett D; Carmalt H
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Mar; 66(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 8639127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stereotactic fine-needle biopsy in 2594 mammographically detected non-palpable lesions.
    Azavedo E; Svane G; Auer G
    Lancet; 1989 May; 1(8646):1033-6. PubMed ID: 2565996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis by physical, radiologic and cytologic combined examinations.
    Azzarelli A; Guzzon A; Pilotti S; Quagliuolo V; Bono A; Di Pietro S
    Tumori; 1983 Apr; 69(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 6679432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Diagnostic value of breast cytology (author's transl)].
    Ide P; Artoos C; Wynants P; Bonte J
    Sem Hop; 1980 Apr 18-25; 56(15-16):762-6. PubMed ID: 6246612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The addition of mammography to breast carcinoma screening in a general gynecology practice. One year's experience.
    Burkons DM; Burkons HF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jul; 48(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 819883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mammographic accuracy and patient age: a study of 297 patients undergoing breast biopsy.
    Davies RJ; A'Hern RP; Parsons CA; Moskovic EC
    Clin Radiol; 1993 Jan; 47(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 8280193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions.
    Kristoffersen Wiberg M; Aspelin P; Perbeck L; Boné B
    Acta Radiol; 2002 May; 43(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12100324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The accuracy of mammography: a comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology.
    Charnvises S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1996 Jan; 79(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 8867398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.