254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32817991)
1. Impact of Transferring a Poor Quality Embryo Along with a Good Quality Embryo on Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles: a Retrospective Study.
Aldemir O; Ozelci R; Baser E; Kaplanoglu I; Dilbaz S; Dilbaz B; Tekin OM
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2020 Aug; 80(8):844-850. PubMed ID: 32817991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.
Pandian Z; Marjoribanks J; Ozturk O; Serour G; Bhattacharya S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; 2013(7):CD003416. PubMed ID: 23897513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Association Between Embryo Quality, Number of Transferred Embryos and Live Birth Rate After Vitrified Cleavage-Stage Embryos and Blastocyst Transfer.
Zhu Q; Lin J; Gao H; Wang N; Wang B; Wang Y
Front Physiol; 2020; 11():930. PubMed ID: 32922305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
JOINT SOGC-CFAS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Aug; 102(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18773532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trade-off between double cleavage-stage embryos transfer and single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients with few good quality embryos in antagonist cycles: a retrospective study using a propensity score matching analysis.
Han Y; Deng X; Cai J; Peng W; Duan C; Huang K
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 May; 24(1):339. PubMed ID: 38702596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elective single-embryo transfer in oocyte donation programmes: Should it be the rule?
Clua E; Tur R; Coroleu B; Boada M; Rodríguez I; Barri PN; Veiga A
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 23069742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle.
De Vos A; Van Landuyt L; Santos-Ribeiro S; Camus M; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2442-2449. PubMed ID: 27619768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population trends and live birth rates associated with common ART treatment strategies.
Chambers GM; Wand H; Macaldowie A; Chapman MG; Farquhar CM; Bowman M; Molloy D; Ledger W
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2632-2641. PubMed ID: 27664207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.
Pandian Z; Bhattacharya S; Ozturk O; Serour G; Templeton A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD003416. PubMed ID: 19370588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adding a low-quality blastocyst to a high-quality blastocyst for a double embryo transfer does not decrease pregnancy and live birth rate.
Theodorou E; Jones BP; Cawood S; Heath C; Serhal P; Ben-Nagi J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jun; 100(6):1124-1131. PubMed ID: 33554348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo together with a good quality embryo affect the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) outcome?
Wintner EM; Hershko-Klement A; Tzadikevitch K; Ghetler Y; Gonen O; Wintner O; Shulman A; Wiser A
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 28086935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards single embryo transfer? Modelling clinical outcomes of potential treatment choices using multiple data sources: predictive models and patient perspectives.
Roberts S; McGowan L; Hirst W; Brison D; Vail A; Lieberman B
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jul; 14(38):1-237. PubMed ID: 20684810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of a poor quality embryo on the implantation chance of a good quality one when transferred together: A study on double blastocyst transfers.
Demirel C; Goksever Celik H; Tulek F; Tuysuz G; Donmez E; Ergin T; Buyru F; Bastu E
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 50(6):101967. PubMed ID: 33161131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Day 4 good morula embryo transfer provided compatible live birth rate with day 5 blastocyst embryo in fresh IVF/ET cycles.
Li RS; Hwu YM; Lee RK; Li SH; Lin MH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 29458903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal number of high-quality cleavage-stage embryos for extended culture to blastocyst-stage for transfer in women 38 years and older.
Xue X; Li W; Li M
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2023 Dec; 39(1):2181642. PubMed ID: 36822231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the addition of Early Embryo Viability Assessment to morphological evaluation on the accuracy of embryo selection on day 3 or day 5: a retrospective analysis.
Revelli A; Canosa S; Carosso A; Filippini C; Paschero C; Gennarelli G; Delle Piane L; Benedetto C
J Ovarian Res; 2019 Aug; 12(1):73. PubMed ID: 31399038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
Glujovsky D; Blake D; Farquhar C; Bardach A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jul; (7):CD002118. PubMed ID: 22786480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
