263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32818840)
1. Virtual reality tour for first-time users of highly automated cars: Comparing the effects of virtual environments with different levels of interaction fidelity.
Ebnali M; Lamb R; Fathi R; Hulme K
Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103226. PubMed ID: 32818840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Get ready for automated driving using Virtual Reality.
Sportillo D; Paljic A; Ojeda L
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():102-113. PubMed ID: 29890368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prior Familiarization With Takeover Requests Affects Drivers' Takeover Performance and Automation Trust.
Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Krems JF
Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):457-470. PubMed ID: 27923886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests.
Körber M; Prasch L; Bengler K
Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):305-323. PubMed ID: 29283269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Westdrive X LoopAR: An Open-Access Virtual Reality Project in Unity for Evaluating User Interaction Methods during Takeover Requests.
Nezami FN; Wächter MA; Maleki N; Spaniol P; Kühne LM; Haas A; Pingel JM; Tiemann L; Nienhaus F; Keller L; König SU; König P; Pipa G
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 33800215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using virtual reality as a replacement for hospital tours during residency interviews.
Zertuche JP; Connors J; Scheinman A; Kothari N; Wong K
Med Educ Online; 2020 Jan; 25(1):1777066. PubMed ID: 32497472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of automation failure type on trust development in driving automation systems.
Mishler S; Chen J
Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103913. PubMed ID: 36201967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.
Nordhoff S; Stapel J; He X; Gentner A; Happee R
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260953. PubMed ID: 34932565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Desktop VR Is Better Than Non-ambulatory HMD VR for Spatial Learning.
Srivastava P; Rimzhim A; Vijay P; Singh S; Chandra S
Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():50. PubMed ID: 33501066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.
Jin M; Lu G; Chen F; Shi X; Tan H; Zhai J
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106156. PubMed ID: 33957474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
Wandtner B; Schömig N; Schmidt G
Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):870-881. PubMed ID: 29617161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial.
Frederiksen JG; Sørensen SMD; Konge L; Svendsen MBS; Nobel-Jørgensen M; Bjerrum F; Andersen SAW
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 31172325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of different takeover request interfaces on takeover behavior and performance during conditionally automated driving.
Ou YK; Huang WX; Fang CW
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106425. PubMed ID: 34601181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions.
Yoon SH; Kim YW; Ji YG
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():150-158. PubMed ID: 30503824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Personalizing automated driving speed to enhance user experience and performance in intermediate-level automated driving.
Delmas M; Camps V; Lemercier C
Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May; 199():107512. PubMed ID: 38377625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using High-Fidelity Virtual Reality for Mass-Casualty Incident Training by First Responders - A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Heldring S; Jirwe M; Wihlborg J; Berg L; Lindström V
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2024 Feb; 39(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 38328887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating Multiple Levels of an Interaction Fidelity Continuum on Performance and Learning in Near-Field Training Simulations.
Bhargava A; Bertrand JW; Gramopadhye AK; Madathil KC; Babu SV
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Apr; 24(4):1418-1427. PubMed ID: 29543160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immersive virtual reality during gait rehabilitation increases walking speed and motivation: a usability evaluation with healthy participants and patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke.
Winter C; Kern F; Gall D; Latoschik ME; Pauli P; Käthner I
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Apr; 18(1):68. PubMed ID: 33888148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating Situation Awareness Cues in Virtual Reality for Users in Dynamic in-Vehicle Environments.
Fereydooni N; Tenenboim E; Walker BN; Peeta S
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Nov; 28(11):3865-3873. PubMed ID: 36048985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
