These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Severe in-stent restenosis missed by coronary CT angiography and accurately detected with FFR Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Pontone G; Rogers C; Pepi M; Bartorelli AL Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jan; 33(1):119-120. PubMed ID: 27581392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Revisiting the Optimal Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Thresholds for Predicting the Physiological Significance of Coronary Artery Disease. Modi BN; Rahman H; Kaier T; Ryan M; Williams R; Briceno N; Ellis H; Pavlidis A; Redwood S; Clapp B; Perera D Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 11(12):e007041. PubMed ID: 30562079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of lesion characteristics on the prediction of optimal poststent fractional flow reserve. Ando H; Takashima H; Suzuki A; Sakurai S; Kumagai S; Kurita A; Waseda K; Amano T Am Heart J; 2016 Dec; 182():119-124. PubMed ID: 27914491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative myocardial blush grade reserve during pharmacologic hyperaemia: a way to perform a real wireless fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with coronary artery disease and intermediate coronary lesions. Hofmann NP; Hardt S; Erbacher M; Dickhaus H; Katus HA; Korosoglou G EuroIntervention; 2017 Apr; 12(18):e2219-e2227. PubMed ID: 27840325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In-stent fractional flow reserve variations and related optical coherence tomography findings: the FFR-OCT co-registration study. Pyxaras SA; Adriaenssens T; Barbato E; Ughi GJ; Di Serafino L; De Vroey F; Toth G; Tu S; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Wijns W Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 29080150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative flow ratio for the prediction of coronary events after percutaneous coronary intervention. Kageyama S; O'Leary N; Chenniganahosahalli Revaiah P; Ninomiya K; Masuda S; Kotoku N; Ilancheran N; Garg S; Harte E; Ni Bheolain G; Reiber JHC; Tu S; Zaman A; Sabaté M; Möllmann H; Sharif F; Lemoine J; Wlodarczak A; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Multivessel Talent Trial Investigators OBOT EuroIntervention; 2024 Jan; 20(1):104-106. PubMed ID: 38165111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Fractional flow reserve: a clinical perspective. Corcoran D; Hennigan B; Berry C Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):961-974. PubMed ID: 28577046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical and prognostic value of poststenting fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes. Kasula S; Agarwal SK; Hacioglu Y; Pothineni NK; Bhatti S; Ahmed Z; Uretsky B; Hakeem A Heart; 2016 Dec; 102(24):1988-1994. PubMed ID: 27492942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Impact of Plaque Rupture on Mismatch Between Intravascular Ultrasound Minimal Lumen Area and Fractional Flow Reserve Measured in an Angiographically Borderline Left Main With Complex Left Anterior Descending Involvement. Świerczewski M; Sala Z; Markiewicz MG; Mintz GS; Kalińczuk Ł J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Apr; 31(4):E60-E61. PubMed ID: 30927535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Why Is Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Not Always 1.0? Tonino PA; Johnson NP JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(10):1032-5. PubMed ID: 27198683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Impact of Coronary Physiology on Contemporary Clinical Decision Making. Kogame N; Ono M; Kawashima H; Tomaniak M; Hara H; Leipsic J; Andreini D; Collet C; Patel MR; Tu S; Xu B; Bourantas CV; Lerman A; Piek JJ; Davies JE; Escaned J; Wijns W; Onuma Y; Serruys PW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 13(14):1617-1638. PubMed ID: 32703589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]