141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3281987)
1. A new index for evaluation of the turbulent noise in pathological voice.
Fukazawa T; el-Assuooty A; Honjo I
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1189-93. PubMed ID: 3281987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The turbulent noise ratio: an estimation of noise power of the breathy voice using PARCOR analysis.
Mori K; Blaugrund SM; Yu JD
Laryngoscope; 1994 Feb; 104(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 8302117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A computer system for acoustic analysis of pathological voices and laryngeal diseases screening.
Hadjitodorov S; Mitev P
Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 12135650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic modeling of acoustic perception of breathiness in pathological voices.
Castillo-Guerra E; Ruíz A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):932-40. PubMed ID: 19423423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method for turbulent noise estimation in voiced signals.
Mitev P; Hadjitodorov S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Nov; 38(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 11217879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
Lebacq J; Schoentgen J; Cantarella G; Bruss FT; Manfredi C; DeJonckere P
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The validity of the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the evaluation of breathy voice quality: A Meta-Analysis.
Barsties V Latoszek B; Kim GH; Delgado Hernández J; Hosokawa K; Englert M; Neumann K; Hetjens S
Clin Otolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 46(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 32770718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some difference limens for the perception of breathiness.
Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):416-23. PubMed ID: 16875237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic parameters for classification of breathiness in continuous speech according to the GRBAS scale.
Stráník A; Čmejla R; Vokřál J
J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):653.e9-653.e17. PubMed ID: 24755168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic, perceptual, aerodynamic and anatomical correlations in voice pathology.
Dejonckere PH; Lebacq J
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1996; 58(6):326-32. PubMed ID: 8958542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic phonetogram recording supplemented with acoustical voice-quality parameters.
Pabon JP; Plomp R
J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):710-22. PubMed ID: 3230899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.
Manfredi C; Lebacq J; Cantarella G; Schoentgen J; Orlandi S; Bandini A; DeJonckere PH
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Timing of Voice Therapy: A Primary Investigation of Voice Outcomes for Surgical Benign Vocal Fold Lesion Patients.
Tang SS; Thibeault SL
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):129.e1-129.e7. PubMed ID: 26776951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
