These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32820342)

  • 1. Cognitive processes during deception about attitudes revisited: a replication study.
    Scheuble V; Beauducel A
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 15(8):839-848. PubMed ID: 32820342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of age on the effects of lying on memory.
    Paige LE; Fields EC; Gutchess A
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Jul; 133():42-53. PubMed ID: 30360917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does deception involve more cognitive control than truth-telling? Meta-analyses of N2 and MFN ERP studies.
    Sai L; Cheng J; Shang S; Fu G; Verschuere B
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Oct; 60(10):e14333. PubMed ID: 37194343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in ERPs during deception: Observing vs. demonstrating behavior leading to a small social conflict.
    Scheuble V; Beauducel A
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Feb; 150():107830. PubMed ID: 31809767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The motor cost of telling lies: electrocortical signatures and personality foundations of spontaneous deception.
    Panasiti MS; Pavone EF; Mancini A; Merla A; Grisoni L; Aglioti SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2014; 9(6):573-89. PubMed ID: 24979665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tell me sweet little lies: An event-related potentials study on the processing of social lies.
    Moreno EM; Casado P; Martín-Loeches M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 27007770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unfolding the spatial and temporal neural processing of lying about face familiarity.
    Sun D; Lee TM; Chan CC
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Apr; 25(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 24186897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deception and the misinformation effect: an event-related potential study.
    Meek SW; Phillips MC; Boswell CP; Vendemia JM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jan; 87(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23183315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cognitive mechanisms underlying deception: an event-related potential study.
    Suchotzki K; Crombez G; Smulders FT; Meijer E; Verschuere B
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):395-405. PubMed ID: 25661698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.
    Lo YH; Tseng P
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1089-1104. PubMed ID: 30022430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Biol Psychol; 2003 Nov; 64(3):217-53. PubMed ID: 14630405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of deception: Event-related potential markers of attention and cognitive control during intentional false responses.
    Gibbons H; Schnuerch R; Wittinghofer C; Armbrecht AS; Stahl J
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jun; 55(6):e13047. PubMed ID: 29226961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Englert C; Brand R; Kissler J
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 May; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27142046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A meta-analysis of the P3 amplitude in tasks requiring deception in legal and social contexts.
    Leue A; Beauducel A
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103564. PubMed ID: 31207542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The processes leading to deception: ERP spatiotemporal principal component analysis and source analysis.
    Sun SY; Mai X; Liu C; Liu JY; Luo YJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 21225491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal course of executive control when lying about self- and other-referential information: an ERP study.
    Hu X; Wu H; Fu G
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1369():149-57. PubMed ID: 21059343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The presentation order of cue and target matters in deception study.
    Dong G; Hu Y; Wu H
    Behav Brain Funct; 2010 Oct; 6():63. PubMed ID: 20964866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.