These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32820528)

  • 1. Stimulus control depends on the subjective value of the outcome.
    Cowie S; Gomes-Ng S; Hopkinson B; Bai JYH; Landon J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Sep; 114(2):216-232. PubMed ID: 32820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bringing the past into the present: Control by exteroceptive stimuli and key-peck location in a concurrent-chains procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Bai JYH; Landon J; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2022 Feb; 195():104585. PubMed ID: 35063630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
    Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling choice across time: Effects of response-reinforcer discriminability.
    Davison M; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Jan; 117(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 34734651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 20885807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 31804106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
    Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency and value both matter in the suboptimal choice procedure.
    Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 30569554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value hypothesis and acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.
    Grace RC
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Feb; 30(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 12017965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.
    Dunn R; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 2324663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Learn Behav; 2019 Sep; 47(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 31011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Divided stimulus control depends on differential and nondifferential reinforcement: Testing a quantitative model.
    Gomes-Ng S; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):344-362. PubMed ID: 37581958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environment tracking and signal following in a reinforcer-ratio reversal procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():208-224. PubMed ID: 30315866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.
    Boutros N; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):39-61. PubMed ID: 21765545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model for food and stimulus changes that signal time-based contingency changes.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Nov; 102(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 25219928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.
    Spetch ML; Belke TW; Barnet RC; Dunn R; Pierce WD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 2324664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.