These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32821701)

  • 1. Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology.
    Lee K; Lim CY
    J Lipid Atheroscler; 2019 Sep; 8(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 32821701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data.
    Sekula P; Del Greco M F; Pattaro C; Köttgen A
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 2016 Nov; 27(11):3253-3265. PubMed ID: 27486138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mendelian randomization approach, used for causal inferences].
    Wang LN; Zhang Z
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 38(4):547-552. PubMed ID: 28468080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modifiable environmental exposure and risk of rheumatoid arthritis-current evidence from genetic studies.
    Jiang X; Alfredsson L
    Arthritis Res Ther; 2020 Jun; 22(1):154. PubMed ID: 32571398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applying Mendelian randomization to appraise causality in relationships between nutrition and cancer.
    Wade KH; Yarmolinsky J; Giovannucci E; Lewis SJ; Millwood IY; Munafò MR; Meddens F; Burrows K; Bell JA; Davies NM; Mariosa D; Kanerva N; Vincent EE; Smith-Byrne K; Guida F; Gunter MJ; Sanderson E; Dudbridge F; Burgess S; Cornelis MC; Richardson TG; Borges MC; Bowden J; Hemani G; Cho Y; Spiller W; Richmond RC; Carter AR; Langdon R; Lawlor DA; Walters RG; Vimaleswaran KS; Anderson A; Sandu MR; Tilling K; Davey Smith G; Martin RM; Relton CL;
    Cancer Causes Control; 2022 May; 33(5):631-652. PubMed ID: 35274198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mendelian randomization analyses in ocular disease: a powerful approach to causal inference with human genetic data.
    Li J; Li C; Huang Y; Guan P; Huang D; Yu H; Yang X; Liu L
    J Transl Med; 2022 Dec; 20(1):621. PubMed ID: 36572895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of causal effects of a time-varying exposure at multiple time points through multivariable mendelian randomization.
    Sanderson E; Richardson TG; Morris TT; Tilling K; Davey Smith G
    PLoS Genet; 2022 Jul; 18(7):e1010290. PubMed ID: 35849575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
    Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mendelian Randomization as a Tool for Cardiovascular Research: A Review.
    Levin MG; Burgess S
    JAMA Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 9(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 37938820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the current state of Mendelian randomization studies: a protocol for a systematic review on methodological and clinical aspects using neurodegenerative disorders as outcome.
    Grover S; Del Greco M F; König IR
    Syst Rev; 2018 Sep; 7(1):145. PubMed ID: 30249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):496-511. PubMed ID: 25953784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies on Endometrial Cancer.
    Guo JZ; Wu QJ; Liu FH; Gao C; Gong TT; Li G
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():783150. PubMed ID: 35615721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mendelian Randomization With Refined Instrumental Variables From Genetic Score Improves Accuracy and Reduces Bias.
    Lin L; Zhang R; Huang H; Zhu Y; Li Y; Dong X; Shen S; Wei L; Chen X; Christiani DC; Wei Y; Chen F
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():618829. PubMed ID: 33868364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Relationship Between Serum Urate and Urolithiasis Using Mendelian Randomization: An Analysis of the UK Biobank.
    Narang RK; Gamble GG; Topless R; Cadzow M; Stamp LK; Merriman TR; Dalbeth N
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2021 Aug; 78(2):210-218. PubMed ID: 33400963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
    Wang YZ; Shen HB
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mendelian Randomization: Concepts and Scope.
    Richmond RC; Davey Smith G
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34426474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach.
    Bucur IG; Claassen T; Heskes T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1081-1111. PubMed ID: 31146640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.