BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32821854)

  • 1. Predictably unequal: understanding and addressing concerns that algorithmic clinical prediction may increase health disparities.
    Paulus JK; Kent DM
    NPJ Digit Med; 2020; 3():99. PubMed ID: 32821854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From fair predictions to just decisions? Conceptualizing algorithmic fairness and distributive justice in the context of data-driven decision-making.
    Kuppler M; Kern C; Bach RL; Kreuter F
    Front Sociol; 2022; 7():883999. PubMed ID: 36299413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction.
    Pfohl SR; Foryciarz A; Shah NH
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Jan; 113():103621. PubMed ID: 33220494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine.
    Xu J; Xiao Y; Wang WH; Ning Y; Shenkman EA; Bian J; Wang F
    EBioMedicine; 2022 Oct; 84():104250. PubMed ID: 36084616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Algorithmic Individual Fairness and Healthcare: A Scoping Review.
    Anderson JW; Visweswaran S
    medRxiv; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38585746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning.
    Grote T; Keeling G
    Ethics Inf Technol; 2022; 24(3):39. PubMed ID: 36060496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addressing Fairness, Bias, and Appropriate Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Global Health.
    Fletcher RR; Nakeshimana A; Olubeko O
    Front Artif Intell; 2020; 3():561802. PubMed ID: 33981989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When predictions are used to allocate scarce health care resources: three considerations for models in the era of Covid-19.
    Kent DM; Paulus JK; Sharp RR; Hajizadeh N
    Diagn Progn Res; 2020; 4():11. PubMed ID: 32455168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causal fairness assessment of treatment allocation with electronic health records.
    Zhang L; Richter LR; Wang Y; Ostropolets A; Elhadad N; Blei DM; Hripcsak G
    J Biomed Inform; 2024 Jul; 155():104656. PubMed ID: 38782170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of fairness in algorithmic decisions: Future developers' perspective.
    Kleanthous S; Kasinidou M; Barlas P; Otterbacher J
    Patterns (N Y); 2022 Jan; 3(1):100380. PubMed ID: 35079711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A joint fairness model with applications to risk predictions for underrepresented populations.
    Do H; Nandi S; Putzel P; Smyth P; Zhong J
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):826-840. PubMed ID: 35142367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation and Mitigation of Racial Bias in Clinical Machine Learning Models: Scoping Review.
    Huang J; Galal G; Etemadi M; Vaidyanathan M
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 May; 10(5):e36388. PubMed ID: 35639450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Algorithmic fairness in precision psychiatry: analysis of prediction models in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.
    Şahin D; Kambeitz-Ilankovic L; Wood S; Dwyer D; Upthegrove R; Salokangas R; Borgwardt S; Brambilla P; Meisenzahl E; Ruhrmann S; Schultze-Lutter F; Lencer R; Bertolino A; Pantelis C; Koutsouleris N; Kambeitz J;
    Br J Psychiatry; 2024 Feb; 224(2):55-65. PubMed ID: 37936347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Joint Fairness Model with Applications to Risk Predictions for Under-represented Populations.
    Do H; Nandi S; Putzel P; Smyth P; Zhong J
    ArXiv; 2021 May; ():. PubMed ID: 34012993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fairness in Mobile Phone-Based Mental Health Assessment Algorithms: Exploratory Study.
    Park J; Arunachalam R; Silenzio V; Singh VK
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jun; 6(6):e34366. PubMed ID: 35699997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An intersectional framework for counterfactual fairness in risk prediction.
    Wastvedt S; Huling JD; Wolfson J
    Biostatistics; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37660301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utilizing data sampling techniques on algorithmic fairness for customer churn prediction with data imbalance problems.
    Maw M; Haw SC; Ho CK
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():988. PubMed ID: 36071889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fairness and Risk: An Ethical Argument for a Group Fairness Definition Insurers Can Use.
    Baumann J; Loi M
    Philos Technol; 2023; 36(3):45. PubMed ID: 37346393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretability and fairness evaluation of deep learning models on MIMIC-IV dataset.
    Meng C; Trinh L; Xu N; Enouen J; Liu Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7166. PubMed ID: 35504931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.