These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3282261)
1. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Reagan K; Bettman MA; Finkelstein J; Ganz P; Grassi CJ Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of ioversol during cardiac angiography. Comparison with iopamidol and diatrizoate. Hirshfeld JW; Wieland J; Davis CA; Giles BD; Passione D; Ray MB; Ripley NS Invest Radiol; 1989 Feb; 24(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 2645244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents. Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent. Bettmann MA; Bourdillon PD; Barry WH; Brush KA; Levin DC Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial. Bettmann MA; Higgins CB Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed body tomography with a new nonionic contrast agent. Comparison of ioversol with sodium/meglumine diatrizoate. McClennan BL; Heiken JP; Lee JK; James MA Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S35-8. PubMed ID: 2687193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography. Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Omnipaque and Urografin in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. A randomised, double blind study. Folke K; Andrew E; Laulund S; Hansen PF Br J Radiol; 1985 Apr; 58(688):319-23. PubMed ID: 3904899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 following left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. Svenson RH Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S333-4. PubMed ID: 6392162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ioversol. Double-blind study of a new low osmolar contrast agent for peripheral and visceral arteriography. Grassi CJ; Bettmann MA; Finkelstein J; Reagan K Invest Radiol; 1989 Feb; 24(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 2917833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of high (sodium meglumine diatrizoate, Renografin-76) and low osmolar (sodium meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) radiographic contrast media on diastolic function during left ventriculography in patients. Aguirre FV; Pedersen W; Castello R; Deligonul U; Gudipati C; Serota H; Labovitz AJ; Kern MJ Am Heart J; 1991 Mar; 121(3 Pt 1):848-57. PubMed ID: 2000752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemodynamic effects of contrast media during coronary angiography: a comparison of three nonionic agents to Hypaque-76. Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 14(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3349517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: a randomized double-blind study. Salem DN; Konstam MA; Isner JM; Bonin JD Am Heart J; 1986 Mar; 111(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 3006464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine. Cooper MW; Reed PJ Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media. Fraser AG; Culling W; Singh H; Ruttley MS; Newcombe RG Eur Heart J; 1984 Sep; 5(9):727-34. PubMed ID: 6389137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical experience with ioversol for angiography. Bettmann MA Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 2687199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuroangiography with iohexol. Bryan RN; Miller SL; Roehm JO; Weatherall PT AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):344-6. PubMed ID: 6410740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of the tolerance of ionic and nonionic contrast media in coronary angiography]. Savchenko AP; Frolova MI; Pavlov NA Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1993; (6):21-4. PubMed ID: 7801591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Coronary arteriography with a plasma-isotonic roentgen contrast medium: effects on ECG, blood pressure and coronary circulation]. Schräder R; Abel J; Sievert H; Friedmann A; Kaltenbach M; Kober G Z Kardiol; 1989 Jan; 78(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 2646839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects. Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]