185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32826165)
1. Retraction of Scientific Writing.
Pollock NW
Wilderness Environ Med; 2020 Sep; 31(3):257-258. PubMed ID: 32826165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.
Zietman AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 23958142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The art and science of scientific writing.
Mestres CA; Sampathkumar A
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2019 Jun; 27(5):335-337. PubMed ID: 31188675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
Klein JS; Harmon SP;
Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.
Hoppeler H; Handel M; Moulton OC
J Exp Biol; 2008 Dec; 211(Pt 23):3651. PubMed ID: 19011202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific record: Class uncorrected errors as misconduct.
Kamoun S; Zipfel C
Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):173. PubMed ID: 26961649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Guidelines for writing journal articles in English.
Suh MH
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2004 Jun; 34(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 15502425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New information for authors and readers. Group authorship, acknowledgements, and rejected manuscripts.
Glass RM
JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(1):99. PubMed ID: 1482435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reflections on a retraction.
Kennedy D
Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5482):1137. PubMed ID: 10970223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Writing for publication: avoiding common ethical pitfalls.
Siedlecki SL; Montague M; Schultz J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 18344788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How many scientific papers should be retracted?
Cokol M; Iossifov I; Rodriguez-Esteban R; Rzhetsky A
EMBO Rep; 2007 May; 8(5):422-3. PubMed ID: 17471252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication].
Comité Internacional de Editores de Revistas Médicas
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 57(6):538-56. PubMed ID: 15225501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Editor's nitpicking.
Castillo M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2010 Sep; 31(8):1353-4. PubMed ID: 20203110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Preventing scientific fraud.
Noble DW
Ann Intern Med; 2006 Sep; 145(6):472; author reply 473-4. PubMed ID: 16983139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Announcement: Towards greater reproducibility for life-sciences research in Nature.
Nature; 2017 May; 546(7656):8. PubMed ID: 28569823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review unmasked.
Brunier G
J CANNT; 1997; 7(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 9362729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
