These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32826286)

  • 1. Evaluation of indicators supporting reproducibility and transparency within cardiology literature.
    Anderson JM; Wright B; Rauh S; Tritz D; Horn J; Parker I; Bergeron D; Cook S; Vassar M
    Heart; 2021 Jan; 107(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 32826286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of practices to promote reproducibility and transparency in anaesthesiology research.
    Okonya O; Rorah D; Tritz D; Umberham B; Wiley M; Vassar M
    Br J Anaesth; 2020 Nov; 125(5):835-842. PubMed ID: 32611528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature.
    Walters C; Harter ZJ; Wayant C; Vo N; Warren M; Chronister J; Tritz D; Vassar M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e033962. PubMed ID: 31892667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in otolaryngology.
    Johnson AL; Torgerson T; Skinner M; Hamilton T; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Aug; 130(8):1894-1901. PubMed ID: 31593300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of key indicators of reproducibility in radiology.
    Wright BD; Vo N; Nolan J; Johnson AL; Braaten T; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Insights Imaging; 2020 May; 11(1):65. PubMed ID: 32394098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017.
    Wallach JD; Boyack KW; Ioannidis JPA
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):e2006930. PubMed ID: 30457984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of reproducible and transparent research practices in pulmonology.
    Smith CA; Nolan J; Tritz DJ; Heavener TE; Pelton J; Cook K; Vassar M
    Pulmonology; 2021; 27(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 32739326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research.
    Rauh S; Torgerson T; Johnson AL; Pollard J; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2020; 5():5. PubMed ID: 32161667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the practice of transparency and reproducibility in addiction medicine literature.
    Adewumi MT; Vo N; Tritz D; Beaman J; Vassar M
    Addict Behav; 2021 Jan; 112():106560. PubMed ID: 32763621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Evaluation of Nephrology Literature for Transparency and Reproducibility Indicators: Cross-Sectional Review.
    Fladie IA; Adewumi TM; Vo NH; Tritz DJ; Vassar MB
    Kidney Int Rep; 2020 Feb; 5(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 32043031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducible Research Practices in the Plastic Surgery Literature.
    Ascha M; Katabi L; Stevens E; Gatherwright J; Vassar M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Apr; 149(4):810e-823e. PubMed ID: 35196293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating Reproducibility and Transparency in Emergency Medicine Publications.
    Johnson BS; Rauh S; Tritz D; Schiesel M; Vassar M
    West J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 22(4):963-971. PubMed ID: 35353995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of transparent and reproducible research practices in the psychiatry literature.
    Sherry CE; Pollard JZ; Tritz D; Carr BK; Pierce A; Vassar M
    Gen Psychiatr; 2020; 33(1):e100149. PubMed ID: 32175523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transparent and Reproducible Research Practices in the Surgical Literature.
    Hughes BT; Niemann A; Tritz D; Boyer K; Robbins H; Vassar M
    J Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 274():116-124. PubMed ID: 35150944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018.
    Rauh S; Johnson BS; Bowers A; Tritz D; Vassar BM
    BMC Urol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):102. PubMed ID: 35820886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transparency in Infectious Disease Research: Meta-research Survey of Specialty Journals.
    Zavalis EA; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Ioannidis JPA
    J Infect Dis; 2023 Aug; 228(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 37132475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?
    Serghiou S; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Boyack KW; Riedel N; Wallach JD; Ioannidis JPA
    PLoS Biol; 2021 Mar; 19(3):e3001107. PubMed ID: 33647013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities.
    Rice DB; Raffoul H; Ioannidis JPA; Moher D
    BMJ; 2020 Jun; 369():m2081. PubMed ID: 32586791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature.
    Iqbal SA; Wallach JD; Khoury MJ; Schully SD; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Jan; 14(1):e1002333. PubMed ID: 26726926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.