These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population. Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight and Doppler analysis of umbilical artery velocimetry in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation: a prospective study. Berkowitz GS; Chitkara U; Rosenberg J; Cogswell C; Walker B; Lahman EA; Mehalek KE; Berkowitz RL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 May; 158(5):1149-53. PubMed ID: 3285687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The hemodynamics of late-onset intrauterine growth restriction by MRI. Zhu MY; Milligan N; Keating S; Windrim R; Keunen J; Thakur V; Ohman A; Portnoy S; Sled JG; Kelly E; Yoo SJ; Gross-Wortmann L; Jaeggi E; Macgowan CK; Kingdom JC; Seed M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):367.e1-367.e17. PubMed ID: 26475425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved prediction of intrauterine growth retardation with use of multiple parameters. Benson CB; Boswell SB; Brown DL; Saltzman DH; Doubilet PM Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 3289097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus. Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting poor neonatal outcome: a comparative study of noninvasive antenatal testing methods. Dubinsky T; Lau M; Powell F; Garcia J; Mastobattista J; Parvey HR; Sickler K; Maklad N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):827-31. PubMed ID: 9057543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limitations of using maximum vertical pocket and other sonographic evaluations of amniotic fluid volume to predict fetal growth: technical or physiologic? Bottoms SF; Welch RA; Zador IE; Sokol RJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul; 155(1):154-8. PubMed ID: 3524237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A combined historic and sonographic score for the detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Hill LM; Guzick D; Belfar HL; Peterson C; Rivello D; Hixson J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 2643071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of single ultrasound parameters in detection of fetal growth restriction. Niknafs P; Sibbald J Am J Perinatol; 2001 Sep; 18(6):325-34. PubMed ID: 11607850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New Israeli Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight Growth Curves as Compared to Current Birth Weight Growth Curves: On What Should Diagnosis of Intrauterine Growth Disorders Be Based? Sapir AZ; Khayyat I; Rabinowitz R; Samueloff A; Drukker L; Sela HY Isr Med Assoc J; 2017 Oct; 19(10):604-609. PubMed ID: 29103236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population. De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]