571 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32829724)
1. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of pasture-based beef cattle production systems in the tropical region (Atlantic Forest biome).
Oliveira PPA; Berndt A; Pedroso AF; Alves TC; Pezzopane JRM; Sakamoto LS; Henrique FL; Rodrigues PHM
Animal; 2020 Sep; 14(S3):s427-s437. PubMed ID: 32829724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Greenhouse gas balance and mitigation of pasture-based dairy production systems in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest Biome.
Oliveira PPA; Berndt A; Pedroso AF; Alves TC; Lemes AP; Oliveira BA; Pezzopane JRM; Rodrigues PHM
Front Vet Sci; 2022; 9():958751. PubMed ID: 36213395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Livestock intensification and environmental sustainability: An analysis based on pasture management scenarios in the brazilian savanna.
Santos COD; Pinto AS; Santos MPD; Alves BJR; Neto MBR; Ferreira LG
J Environ Manage; 2024 Mar; 355():120473. PubMed ID: 38430884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pasture intensification in beef cattle production can affect methane emission intensity.
Sakamoto LS; Berndt A; Pedroso AF; Lemes AP; Azenha MV; Alves TC; Rodrigues PHM; Corte RR; Leme PR; Oliveira PPA
J Anim Sci; 2020 Oct; 98(10):. PubMed ID: 32930330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.
O'Brien D; Herron J; Andurand J; Caré S; Martinez P; Migliorati L; Moro M; Pirlo G; Dollé JB
Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):834-845. PubMed ID: 31666147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.
Tedeschi LO; Beauchemin KA
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36645233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through different dairy cattle systems in subtropical regions.
Ribeiro-Filho HMN; Civiero M; Kebreab E
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234687. PubMed ID: 32555654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand.
Robertson K; Symes W; Garnham M
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4279-93. PubMed ID: 25981064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forage peanut legume as a strategy for improving beef production without increasing livestock greenhouse gas emissions.
Homem BGC; Borges LPC; de Lima IBG; Guimarães BC; Spasiani PP; Ferreira IM; Meo-Filho P; Berndt A; Alves BJR; Urquiaga S; Boddey RM; Casagrande DR
Animal; 2024 May; 18(5):101158. PubMed ID: 38703756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Afforestation: Replacing livestock emissions with carbon sequestration.
Duffy C; O'Donoghue C; Ryan M; Styles D; Spillane C
J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 264():110523. PubMed ID: 32250923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pasture-derived greenhouse gas emissions in cow-calf production systems.
Chiavegato MB; Powers WJ; Carmichael D; Rowntree JE
J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):1350-64. PubMed ID: 26020912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef.
Blaustein-Rejto D; Soltis N; Blomqvist L
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295035. PubMed ID: 38091302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Availability of disaggregated greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production: a systematic review.
Lynch J
Environ Impact Assess Rev; 2019 May; 76():69-78. PubMed ID: 31388221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk.
Ledgard SF; Falconer SJ; Abercrombie R; Philip G; Hill JP
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):1031-1046. PubMed ID: 31759588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response of Pasture Nitrogen Fertilization on Greenhouse Gas Emission and Net Protein Contribution of Nellore Young Bulls.
Lima L; Ongaratto F; Fernandes M; Cardoso A; Lage J; Silva L; Reis R; Malheiros E
Animals (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(22):. PubMed ID: 36428400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues.
Vergé XP; Maxime D; Dyer JA; Desjardins RL; Arcand Y; Vanderzaag A
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6091-104. PubMed ID: 23831091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental impact of primary beef production chain in Colombia: Carbon footprint, non-renewable energy and land use using Life Cycle Assessment.
González-Quintero R; Bolívar-Vergara DM; Chirinda N; Arango J; Pantevez H; Barahona-Rosales R; Sánchez-Pinzón MS
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 773():145573. PubMed ID: 33940733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.
Styles D; Gonzalez-Mejia A; Moorby J; Foskolos A; Gibbons J
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 28940511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
