These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3282981)

  • 1. Power of the affected-sib-pair method for heterogeneous disorders.
    Goldin LR; Gershon ES
    Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 3282981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact elods and exact power for affected sib pairs analyzed for linkage under simple right and wrong models.
    Hodge SE
    Am J Med Genet; 1998 Feb; 81(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 9514591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power of the linkage test for a heterogeneous disorder due to two independent inherited causes: a simulation study.
    Martinez M; Goldin LR
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(3):219-30. PubMed ID: 2370000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power of non-parametric linkage analysis in mapping genes contributing to human longevity in long-lived sib-pairs.
    Tan Q; Zhao JH; Iachine I; Hjelmborg J; Vach W; Vaupel JW; Christensen K; Kruse TA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 26(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 15022210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size needed to detect gene-gene interactions using linkage analysis.
    Wang S; Zhao H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Nov; 71(Pt 6):828-42. PubMed ID: 17521308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Irish study on high-density schizophrenia families: field methods and power to detect linkage.
    Kendler KS; O'Neill FA; Burke J; Murphy B; Duke F; Straub RE; Shinkwin R; Ni Nuallain M; MacLean CJ; Walsh D
    Am J Med Genet; 1996 Apr; 67(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 8723045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utility of the affected sib pair method to detect linkage of a sex-linked dominant disease with a sex-linked recessive trait.
    Chakraborty R
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(1):281-6. PubMed ID: 2786486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linkage studies of schizophrenia: a stimulation study of statistical power.
    Chen WJ; Faraone SV; Tsuang MT
    Genet Epidemiol; 1992; 9(2):123-39. PubMed ID: 1639244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affective disorder not linked to HLA.
    Price RA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(1):299-304. PubMed ID: 2731719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members.
    Whittemore AS; Halpern J
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):118-27. PubMed ID: 8086596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Availability of schizophrenic patients and their families for genetic linkage studies: findings from the Maryland epidemiology sample.
    Pulver AE; Bale SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(6):671-80. PubMed ID: 2606340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic linkage mapping for a susceptibility locus to bipolar illness: chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10p, 11p, 22, and Xpter.
    Detera-Wadleigh SD; Hsieh WT; Berrettini WH; Goldin LR; Rollins DY; Muniec D; Grewal R; Guroff JJ; Turner G; Coffman D
    Am J Med Genet; 1994 Sep; 54(3):206-18. PubMed ID: 7810578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of varying diagnostic thresholds on affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Kendler KS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):407-19. PubMed ID: 3209053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size required for predefined linkage decision quality.
    Ginsburg EK; Axenovich TI
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(5):479-91. PubMed ID: 9358266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analytic strategies to detect linkage to a common disorder with genetically determined age of onset: diabetes mellitus in Pima Indians.
    Hanson RL; Knowler WC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 9593115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of reduced fertility, method of ascertainment, and a second unlinked locus on affected sib-pair marker allele sharing.
    Risch N
    Am J Med Genet; 1983 Oct; 16(2):243-59. PubMed ID: 6580817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.