96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32831520)
1. Views on GWAS statistical analysis.
Cao X; Xing L; He H; Zhang X
Bioinformation; 2020; 16(5):393-397. PubMed ID: 32831520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How powerful are summary-based methods for identifying expression-trait associations under different genetic architectures?
Veturi Y; Ritchie MD
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2018; 23():228-239. PubMed ID: 29218884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel linkage disequilibrium clustering algorithm identifies new lupus genes on meta-analysis of GWAS datasets.
Saeed M
Immunogenetics; 2017 May; 69(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 28246883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overview of Statistical Methods for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
Hayes B
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():149-69. PubMed ID: 23756890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploiting Linkage Disequilibrium for Ultrahigh-Dimensional Genome-Wide Data with an Integrated Statistical Approach.
Carlsen M; Fu G; Bushman S; Corcoran C
Genetics; 2016 Feb; 202(2):411-26. PubMed ID: 26661113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PCA-Based Multiple-Trait GWAS Analysis: A Powerful Model for Exploring Pleiotropy.
Zhang W; Gao X; Shi X; Zhu B; Wang Z; Gao H; Xu L; Zhang L; Li J; Chen Y
Animals (Basel); 2018 Dec; 8(12):. PubMed ID: 30562943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Weighting sequence variants based on their annotation increases the power of genome-wide association studies in dairy cattle.
Cai Z; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 May; 51(1):20. PubMed ID: 31077144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrate multiple traits to detect novel trait-gene association using GWAS summary data with an adaptive test approach.
Guo B; Wu B
Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(13):2251-2257. PubMed ID: 30476000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical Comparisons of Different Statistical Models To Identify and Validate Kernel Row Number-Associated Variants from Structured Multi-parent Mapping Populations of Maize.
Yang J; Yeh CE; Ramamurthy RK; Qi X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JCM; Garrick DJ; Nettleton D; Schnable PS
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Nov; 8(11):3567-3575. PubMed ID: 30213868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genome-Wide Association Analyses in the Model Rhizobium
Epstein B; Abou-Shanab RAI; Shamseldin A; Taylor MR; Guhlin J; Burghardt LT; Nelson M; Sadowsky MJ; Tiffin P
mSphere; 2018 Oct; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 30355664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing power and precision of within-breed and multibreed genome-wide association studies of production traits using whole-genome sequence data for 5 French and Danish dairy cattle breeds.
van den Berg I; Boichard D; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Nov; 99(11):8932-8945. PubMed ID: 27568046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selecting Closely-Linked SNPs Based on Local Epistatic Effects for Haplotype Construction Improves Power of Association Mapping.
Liu F; Schmidt RH; Reif JC; Jiang Y
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Dec; 9(12):4115-4126. PubMed ID: 31604824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limits on the reproducibility of marker associations with southern leaf blight resistance in the maize nested association mapping population.
Bian Y; Yang Q; Balint-Kurti PJ; Wisser RJ; Holland JB
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1068. PubMed ID: 25475173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multiple regression method for genomewide association studies using only linkage information.
Mei B; Wang Z
J Genet; 2018 Jun; 97(2):477-482. PubMed ID: 29932068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A powerful statistical framework for generalization testing in GWAS, with application to the HCHS/SOL.
Sofer T; Heller R; Bogomolov M; Avery CL; Graff M; North KE; Reiner AP; Thornton TA; Rice K; Benjamini Y; Laurie CC; Kerr KF
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):251-258. PubMed ID: 28090672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and power of a large grapevine (Vitis vinifera L) diversity panel newly designed for association studies.
Nicolas SD; Péros JP; Lacombe T; Launay A; Le Paslier MC; Bérard A; Mangin B; Valière S; Martins F; Le Cunff L; Laucou V; Bacilieri R; Dereeper A; Chatelet P; This P; Doligez A
BMC Plant Biol; 2016 Mar; 16():74. PubMed ID: 27005772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning the optimal scale for GWAS through hierarchical SNP aggregation.
Guinot F; Szafranski M; Ambroise C; Samson F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):459. PubMed ID: 30497371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Translating genome wide association study results to associations among common diseases: in silico study with an electronic medical record.
Anand V; Rosenman MB; Downs SM
Int J Med Inform; 2013 Sep; 82(9):864-74. PubMed ID: 23743324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiple testing in genome-wide association studies via hidden Markov models.
Wei Z; Sun W; Wang K; Hakonarson H
Bioinformatics; 2009 Nov; 25(21):2802-8. PubMed ID: 19654115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What has GWAS done for HLA and disease associations?
Kennedy AE; Ozbek U; Dorak MT
Int J Immunogenet; 2017 Oct; 44(5):195-211. PubMed ID: 28877428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
