166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32832064)
1. Total cost of carbon capture and storage implemented at a regional scale: northeastern and midwestern United States.
Schmelz WJ; Hochman G; Miller KG
Interface Focus; 2020 Oct; 10(5):20190065. PubMed ID: 32832064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Baseload coal investment decisions under uncertain carbon legislation.
Bergerson JA; Lave LB
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 May; 41(10):3431-6. PubMed ID: 17547159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strategic Carbon Dioxide Infrastructure to Achieve a Low-Carbon Power Sector in the Midwestern and South-Central United States.
Tao Y; Edwards RWJ; Mauzerall DL; Celia MA
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(22):15013-15024. PubMed ID: 34714051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Clark VR; Herzog HJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of potential, cost, and environmental benefits of CCS-EWR technology for coal-fired power plants in Yellow River Basin of China.
Xu M; Zhang X; Shen S; Wei S; Fan JL
J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 292():112717. PubMed ID: 34015611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO
Edmonds J; Nichols C; Adamantiades M; Bistline J; Huster J; Iyer G; Johnson N; Patel P; Showalter S; Victor N; Waldhoff S; Wise M; Wood F
Energy Policy; 2020; 146():. PubMed ID: 35444362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.
Hardisty PE; Sivapalan M; Brooks P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 May; 8(5):1460-77. PubMed ID: 21655130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey.
Ağralı S; Üçtuğ FG; Türkmen BA
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():305-315. PubMed ID: 29574208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.
Anderson JJ; Rode DC; Zhai H; Fischbeck PS
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 56(16):11162-11171. PubMed ID: 35926127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. National-level infrastructure and economic effects of switchgrass cofiring with coal in existing power plants for carbon mitigation.
Morrow WR; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(10):3501-7. PubMed ID: 18546680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term energy and climate implications of carbon capture and storage deployment strategies in the US coal-fired electricity fleet.
Sathre R; Masanet E
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9768-76. PubMed ID: 22857130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage.
Sekar A; Williams E; Chester M
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11705-12. PubMed ID: 25187199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO
Subraveti SG; Rodríguez Angel E; Ramírez A; Roussanaly S
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Feb; 57(6):2595-2601. PubMed ID: 36731169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Opportunity for offshore wind to reduce future demand for coal-fired power plants in China with consequent savings in emissions of CO2.
Lu X; McElroy MB; Chen X; Kang C
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14764-71. PubMed ID: 25409413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impacts of carbon markets and subsidies on carbon capture and storage retrofitting of existing coal-fired units in China.
Li K; Yang J; Wei Y
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 326(Pt B):116824. PubMed ID: 36442336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-Resolved Cost Analysis of Natural Gas Power Plant Conversion to Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage to Support Net-Zero Emissions.
Sproul E; Barlow J; Quinn JC
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(23):15338-15346. PubMed ID: 33183006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
