312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32833113)
1. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry and pitfalls in the assessment of osteoporosis: a primer for the practicing clinician.
Wong CP; Gani LU; Chong LR
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Aug; 15(1):135. PubMed ID: 32833113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of DXA for monitoring, technical aspects of DXA BMD measurement and precision testing.
Carey JJ; Delaney MF
Bone; 2017 Nov; 104():44-53. PubMed ID: 28554549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Common errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in imaging centers in Ecuador.
Maldonado G; Intriago M; Larroude M; Aguilar G; Moreno M; Gonzalez J; Vargas S; Vera C; Rios K; Rios C
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jan; 15(1):6. PubMed ID: 31897808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral densitometry may flaw osteopenic/osteoporotic interpretations and mislead assessment of antiresorptive therapy effectiveness.
Bolotin HH
Bone; 2001 May; 28(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 11344055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Watts NB
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Nov; 15(11):847-54. PubMed ID: 15322740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice: application and interpretation of scans beyond the numbers.
Theodorou DJ; Theodorou SJ
Clin Imaging; 2002; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 11814753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone health of children with intestinal failure measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and digital X-ray radiogrammetry.
Neelis E; Rijnen N; Sluimer J; Olieman J; Rizopoulos D; Wijnen R; Rings E; de Koning B; Hulst J
Clin Nutr; 2018 Apr; 37(2):687-694. PubMed ID: 28274657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting: Pearls and Pitfalls.
Martineau P; Morgan SL; Leslie WD
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Aug; 72(3):490-504. PubMed ID: 32309998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DXA scanning in clinical practice.
El Maghraoui A; Roux C
QJM; 2008 Aug; 101(8):605-17. PubMed ID: 18334497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone health in childhood and adolescence: an overview on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning, fracture surveillance and bisphosphonate therapy for low-middle-income countries.
Madhuchani D; Seneviratne SN; Ward LM
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1082413. PubMed ID: 37139332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertebral bone attenuation on low-dose chest CT: quantitative volumetric analysis for bone fragility assessment.
Kim YW; Kim JH; Yoon SH; Lee JH; Lee CH; Shin CS; Park YS
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):329-338. PubMed ID: 27480628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Blake GM; Fogelman I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 19647962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) as a Complementary Approach to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for Fracture Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice.
Shevroja E; Lamy O; Kohlmeier L; Koromani F; Rivadeneira F; Hans D
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):334-345. PubMed ID: 28734710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.
Blake GM; Fogelman I
Postgrad Med J; 2007 Aug; 83(982):509-17. PubMed ID: 17675543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone densitometry of the forearm: comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Eckert P; Casez JP; Thiébaud D; Schnyder P; Burckhardt P
Bone; 1996 Jun; 18(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 8805999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing DXA to Assess Skeletal Health: Key Concepts for Clinicians.
Kennel KA; Sfeir JG; Drake MT
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2020 Dec; 105(12):. PubMed ID: 32894765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry along with bone mineral density in the evaluation of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Shetty S; John B; Mohan S; Paul TV
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Feb; 15(1):25. PubMed ID: 32095943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
