These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32833348)
1. A comparison of meta-methods for synthesizing indirect effects. van Zundert CHJ; Miočević M Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):849-865. PubMed ID: 32833348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Oort FJ; Jak S Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 27286901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Random-effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: review, issues, and illustrations. Cheung MW; Cheung SF Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):140-55. PubMed ID: 27286900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation. López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for Missing Correlation Coefficients in Fixed-Effects MASEM. Jak S; Cheung MW Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 29220593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies. Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown. Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Random-effects meta-analysis of few studies involving rare events. Günhan BK; Röver C; Friede T Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jan; 11(1):74-90. PubMed ID: 31348846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis. Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical properties of four effect-size measures for mediation models. Miočević M; O'Rourke HP; MacKinnon DP; Brown HC Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):285-301. PubMed ID: 28342072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Bayesian method for synthesizing evidence. The Confidence Profile Method. Eddy DM; Hasselblad V; Shachter R Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1990; 6(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 2361818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data. Seide SE; Jensen K; Kieser M Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):363-378. PubMed ID: 31955519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of methods for estimating quadratic effects in nonlinear structural equation models. Harring JR; Weiss BA; Hsu JC Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):193-214. PubMed ID: 22429193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A tutorial on the meta-analytic structural equation modeling of reliability coefficients. Scherer R; Teo T Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):747-775. PubMed ID: 32134314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference. Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of model-based network meta-analysis (MBNMA) of time-course relationships: A simulation study. Pedder H; Boucher M; Dias S; Bennetts M; Welton NJ Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):678-697. PubMed ID: 32662206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A bias-reduced generalized estimating equation approach for proportional odds models with small-sample longitudinal ordinal data. Tada Y; Sato T BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):140. PubMed ID: 38943068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters. Jak S; Cheung MW Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indirect Effects in Sequential Mediation Models: Evaluating Methods for Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Interval Formation. Tofighi D; Kelley K Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):188-210. PubMed ID: 31179751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian bias-adjusted random-effects model for synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions. Yao M; Mei F; Zou K; Li L; Sun X J Evid Based Med; 2024 Sep; 17(3):550-558. PubMed ID: 39107946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]