These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32833587)

  • 21. Amplitude Growth Functions of Auditory Nerve Responses to Electric Pulse Stimulation With Varied Interphase Gaps in Cochlear Implant Users With Ipsilateral Residual Hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014137. PubMed ID: 34181493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
    Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Johnson KC; Xie Z; Shader MJ; Mayo PG; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211007367. PubMed ID: 34028313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users.
    Kosaner J; Spitzer P; Bayguzina S; Gultekin M; Behar LA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29291688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential threshold and slope in HiRes 90K(TM) users.
    Nehmé A; El Zir E; Moukarzel N; Haidar H; Vanpoucke F; Arnold L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24456380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Holden TA; Zwolan TA; Arts HA; Firszt JB; Buswinka CJ; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Jun; 21(3):259-275. PubMed ID: 32342256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Panoramic ECAP Method: Estimating Patient-Specific Patterns of Current Spread and Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Garcia C; Goehring T; Cosentino S; Turner RE; Deeks JM; Brochier T; Rughooputh T; Bance M; Carlyon RP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 22(5):567-589. PubMed ID: 33891218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Laurello SA
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Broadly Applicable Method for Characterizing the Slope of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude Growth Function.
    Skidmore J; Ramekers D; Colesa DJ; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE; He S
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):150-164. PubMed ID: 34241983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unravelling the temporal properties of human eCAPs through an iterative deconvolution model.
    Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Biesheuvel JD; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
    Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():108037. PubMed ID: 32827881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential and speech perception: a study in cochlear implant users with short electrode array.
    Kim JR; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Kim LS
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1041-8. PubMed ID: 20634770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing temporal responsiveness of primary stimulated neurons in auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users.
    Azadpour M; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Svirsky MA
    Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 401():108163. PubMed ID: 33434815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the relationship between neural health measures and speech performance with simultaneous electric stimulation in cochlear implant listeners.
    Langner F; Arenberg JG; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261295. PubMed ID: 34898654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
    Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relation between ECAP measurements and the effect of rate on behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    McKay CM; Smale N
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 346():62-70. PubMed ID: 28213133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.
    Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():67-76. PubMed ID: 25445817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.