227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32833967)
1. Pan-genomic open reading frames: A potential supplement of single nucleotide polymorphisms in estimation of heritability and genomic prediction.
Li Z; Simianer H
PLoS Genet; 2020 Aug; 16(8):e1008995. PubMed ID: 32833967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple-trait QTL mapping and genomic prediction for wool traits in sheep.
Bolormaa S; Swan AA; Brown DJ; Hatcher S; Moghaddar N; van der Werf JH; Goddard ME; Daetwyler HD
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):62. PubMed ID: 28810834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic prediction in contrast to a genome-wide association study in explaining heritable variation of complex growth traits in breeding populations of Eucalyptus.
Müller BSF; Neves LG; de Almeida Filho JE; Resende MFR; Muñoz PR; Dos Santos PET; Filho EP; Kirst M; Grattapaglia D
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):524. PubMed ID: 28693539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
Naderi S; Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling heterogeneous (co)variances from adjacent-SNP groups improves genomic prediction for milk protein composition traits.
Gebreyesus G; Lund MS; Buitenhuis B; Bovenhuis H; Poulsen NA; Janss LG
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):89. PubMed ID: 29207947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
Dong L; Xiao S; Wang Q; Wang Z
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():460. PubMed ID: 27301965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction Accuracies of Genomic Selection for Nine Commercially Important Traits in the Portuguese Oyster (
Vu SV; Gondro C; Nguyen NTH; Gilmour AR; Tearle R; Knibb W; Dove M; Vu IV; Khuong LD; O'Connor W
Genes (Basel); 2021 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33535381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome-wide association study and genomic predictions for exterior traits in Yorkshire pigs1.
Lee J; Lee S; Park JE; Moon SH; Choi SW; Go GW; Lim D; Kim JM
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2793-2802. PubMed ID: 31087081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic dissection and prediction of feed intake and residual feed intake traits using a longitudinal model in F2 chickens.
Emamgholi Begli H; Vaez Torshizi R; Masoudi AA; Ehsani A; Jensen J
Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1792-1798. PubMed ID: 29268803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome-wide identification of major genes and genomic prediction using high-density and text-mined gene-based SNP panels in Hanwoo (Korean cattle).
Lee HJ; Chung YJ; Jang S; Seo DW; Lee HK; Yoon D; Lim D; Lee SH
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241848. PubMed ID: 33264312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the performance of a novel method for genomic selectio:rrBLUP-method6.
Ahmadi Z; Kesbi FG
J Genet; 2021; 100():. PubMed ID: 34187971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
