BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32834973)

  • 1. Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals.
    Ortiz-Barrios M; Gul M; López-Meza P; Yucesan M; Navarro-Jiménez E
    Int J Disaster Risk Reduct; 2020 Oct; 49():101748. PubMed ID: 32834973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian BWM and VIKOR-based model for assessing hospital preparedness in the face of disasters.
    Saner HS; Yucesan M; Gul M
    Nat Hazards (Dordr); 2022; 111(2):1603-1635. PubMed ID: 34803219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A fuzzy hybrid decision-making framework for increasing the hospital disaster preparedness: The colombian case.
    Ortiz-Barrios M; Gul M; Yucesan M; Alfaro-Sarmiento I; Navarro-Jiménez E; Jiménez-Delgado G
    Int J Disaster Risk Reduct; 2022 Apr; 72():102831. PubMed ID: 35155097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ranking Hospitals Based on the Disasters Preparedness Using the TOPSIS Technique in Western Iran.
    Hosseini SM; Bahadori M; Raadabadi M; Ravangard R
    Hosp Top; 2019 Jan; 97(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 30601106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of Service Quality in Teaching Hospitals of Yazd University of Medical Sciences: Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques.
    Shafii M; Rafiei S; Abooee F; Bahrami MA; Nouhi M; Lotfi F; Khanjankhani K
    Osong Public Health Res Perspect; 2016 Aug; 7(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 27635374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS.
    Nabizadeh R; Yousefzadeh S; Yaghmaeian K; Alimohammadi M; Mokhtari Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20437-20448. PubMed ID: 34735703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Establishing the Domains of a Hospital Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool: A Systematic Review.
    Munasinghe NL; O'Reilly G; Cameron P
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2022 Oct; 37(5):674-686. PubMed ID: 36052843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Hybrid FMCDM Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of Homestays.
    Chou TY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable implementation of effective green supply chain management practices.
    Boutkhoum O; Hanine M; Boukhriss H; Agouti T; Tikniouine A
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):664. PubMed ID: 27350904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision-making framework for identifying regions vulnerable to transmission of COVID-19 pandemic.
    Gupta R; Rathore B; Srivastava A; Biswas B
    Comput Ind Eng; 2022 Jul; 169():108207. PubMed ID: 35529174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital disaster preparedness in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of English literature.
    Farah B; Pavlova M; Groot W
    BMC Emerg Med; 2023 Jun; 23(1):71. PubMed ID: 37365529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolved distance measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their exploitation in the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions.
    Chen TY
    Artif Intell Rev; 2023; 56(7):7347-7401. PubMed ID: 36536928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving flood disaster preparedness of hospitals in Central Thailand: Hospital personnel perspectives.
    Rattanakanlaya K; Sukonthasarn A; Wangsrikhun S; Chanprasit C
    J Clin Nurs; 2022 Apr; 31(7-8):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 34288175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A New Decision Model Approach for Health Technology Assessment and A Case Study for Dialysis Alternatives in Turkey.
    Öztürk N; Tozan H; Vayvay Ö
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32455609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches.
    Heidarisoltanabadi M; Elhami B; Imanmehr A; Khadivi A
    Food Sci Nutr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 38370082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing the Disaster Preparedness Capability of Local Government Using AHP: Zhengzhou 7.20 Rainstorm Disaster.
    Zhai L; Lee JE
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36673708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
    Do QH; Tran VT; Tran TT
    Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e30772. PubMed ID: 38933935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery.
    Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of dominant risk factor involved in spread of COVID-19 using hesitant fuzzy MCDM methodology.
    Ghorui N; Ghosh A; Mondal SP; Bajuri MY; Ahmadian A; Salahshour S; Ferrara M
    Results Phys; 2021 Feb; 21():103811. PubMed ID: 33520630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey of flood disaster preparedness among hospitals in the central region of Thailand.
    Rattanakanlaya K; Sukonthasarn A; Wangsrikhun S; Chanprasit C
    Australas Emerg Nurs J; 2016 Nov; 19(4):191-197. PubMed ID: 27495125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.