These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32835863)

  • 41. Written narratives from immigrants following a prenatal diagnosis: qualitative exploratory study.
    Carlsson T; Balbas B; Mattsson E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 May; 19(1):154. PubMed ID: 31060526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey.
    Boz İ; Teskereci G; Akman G
    Women Birth; 2016 Aug; 29(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 26846560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening?
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; Ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Genet Med; 2005; 7(5):332-8. PubMed ID: 15915085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influences on vaginal birth after caesarean section: A qualitative study of Taiwanese women.
    Chen MM; McKellar L; Pincombe J
    Women Birth; 2017 Apr; 30(2):e132-e139. PubMed ID: 27818106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Attitudes toward prenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities: A focus group study.
    Munro S; Sou J; Zhang W; Mohammadi T; Trenaman L; Langlois S; Anis AH
    Women Birth; 2019 Aug; 32(4):364-371. PubMed ID: 30270016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Concerns of Pregnant Women in "Prenatal Screening/Diagnosis" Practice and Termination of Pregnancy.
    Kasnakoglu BT; Cakar M; Okem ZG; Tanacan A; Fadiloglu E; Orgul G; Beksac MS
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2020 Jun; 224(3):136-142. PubMed ID: 32157675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of women's decision-making autonomy on antenatal care utilisation and institutional delivery services in Nigeria: evidence from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018.
    Imo CK
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Feb; 22(1):141. PubMed ID: 35193504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Embodied experiences of prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality and pregnancy termination.
    Pitt P; McClaren BJ; Hodgson J
    Reprod Health Matters; 2016 May; 24(47):168-77. PubMed ID: 27578350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Risk and uncertainty: shifting decision making for aneuploidy screening to the first trimester of pregnancy.
    Farrell RM; Dolgin N; Flocke SA; Winbush V; Mercer MB; Simon C
    Genet Med; 2011 May; 13(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 21293275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Women's preferences for and experiences with prenatal genetic testing decision making: Sociodemographic disparities in preference-concordant decision making.
    Molina F; Dehlendorf C; Gregorich SE; Kuppermann M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Mar; 102(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 30502029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Women's experiences of counselling in cases of a screen-positive prenatal screening result.
    Vuorenlehto L; Hinnelä K; Äyräs O; Ulander VM; Louhiala P; Kaijomaa M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247164. PubMed ID: 33690660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. High risk-What's next? A survey study on decisional conflict, regret, and satisfaction among high-risk pregnant women making choices about further prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy.
    Hartwig TS; Borregaard Miltoft C; Malmgren CI; Tabor A; Jørgensen FS
    Prenat Diagn; 2019 Jul; 39(8):635-642. PubMed ID: 31083781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16242899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and pregnant women's views on good motherhood: a qualitative study.
    Garcia E; Henneman L; Gitsels-van der Wal JT; Martin L; Koopmanschap I; Bekker MN; Timmermans DRM
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2022 Jun; 30(6):669-675. PubMed ID: 34400811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Implementing Group Prenatal Counseling for Expanded Noninvasive Screening Options.
    Gammon BL; Otto L; Wick M; Borowski K; Allyse M
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Aug; 27(4):894-901. PubMed ID: 29247311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychological correlates of decision-making during prenatal diagnosis: a prospective study.
    Brondino N; Colombini G; Morandotti N; Podavini F; De Vidovich G; Formica M; Arossa A; De Silvestri A; Montanari L; Caverzasi E
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jun; 34(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 23706024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prenatal testing: Does reproductive autonomy succeed in dispelling eugenic concerns?
    Begović D
    Bioethics; 2019 Oct; 33(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 31264236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Women's experiences of their involvement around care decisions during a subsequent pregnancy after a previous caesarean birth in Western Australia.
    Chan MH; Hauck Y; Kuliukas L; Lewis L
    Women Birth; 2021 Sep; 34(5):e442-e450. PubMed ID: 33004288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Exploring informed choice in the context of prenatal testing: findings from a qualitative study.
    Potter BK; O'Reilly N; Etchegary H; Howley H; Graham ID; Walker M; Coyle D; Chorny Y; Cappelli M; Boland I; Wilson BJ
    Health Expect; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-65. PubMed ID: 18798759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Determinants associated with making prenatal screening decisions in a national study.
    Bakst S; Romano-Zelekha O; Ostrovsky J; Shohat T
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30244627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.