315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32838951)
1. Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years.
Mazaleyrat M; Favard L; Garaud P; Boileau P; Berhouet J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32838951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term evaluation of humeral stress shielding following reverse shoulder arthroplasty using press-fit fixation compared with cemented fixation.
Denard PJ; Haidamous G; Gobezie R; Romeo AA; Lederman E
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 May; 29(5):906-912. PubMed ID: 31911215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Humeral osteolysis after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using cemented or cementless stems comparative retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 9 years.
Mazaleyrat M; Favard L; Boileau P; Berhouet J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Jun; 107(4):102916. PubMed ID: 33812096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; DeVito P; Tahal DS; Mijc D; Ameri B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2097-2108. PubMed ID: 31107323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are short press-fit stems comparable to standard-length cemented stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Van de Kleut ML; Yuan X; Athwal GS; Teeter MG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Mar; 31(3):580-590. PubMed ID: 34968694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cemented versus uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures.
Rossi LA; Guillermina BM; Buljubasich M; Atala N; Tanoira I; Bongiovanni S; Ranalletta M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):261-268. PubMed ID: 34358669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes associated with an adjustable diaphyseal press-fit humeral stem in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Harmsen SM; Norris TR
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Sep; 26(9):1589-1597. PubMed ID: 28395945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Cemented or uncemented stem?
Lopiz Y; García-Fernandez C; Vallejo-Carrasco M; Garriguez-Pérez D; Achaerandio L; Tesoro-Gonzalo C; Marco F
Int Orthop; 2022 Mar; 46(3):635-644. PubMed ID: 35034145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do the humeral radiographic changes at 5-year follow-up affect the clinical outcomes of press-fit humeral stems in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasties?
García-Fernández C; Lopiz Y; Garríguez-Pérez D; Arvinius C; Ponz V; Echevarria M; Garrido A; Marco F
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 May; 34(4):1851-1863. PubMed ID: 38431896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proximal humeral bone defect in reverse shoulder arthroplasty combined with latissimus-dorsi transfer is not related with a poor outcome.
Valenti P; Zampeli F; Caruso G; Nidtahar I; Martinez-Catalan N; Kazum E
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 May; 108(3):103263. PubMed ID: 35248792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of cemented versus press-fit primary humeral stem fixation in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Salesky MA; Grace TR; Feeley BT; Ma CB; Zhang AL
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 May; 27(5):801-807. PubMed ID: 29548544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Kim SC; Park JH; Bukhary H; Yoo JC
Int Orthop; 2022 Jun; 46(6):1341-1349. PubMed ID: 35353240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cohort comparison of humeral implant designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: does implant design lead to lower rates of complications and revision?
Gorman RA; Christmas KN; Simon P; Mighell MA; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):850-857. PubMed ID: 32771605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cemented vs. press-fit humeral stems: a matched cohort analysis at a mean follow-up of 10 years.
Li T; Duey AH; Patel AV; White CA; Levy KH; Ranson WA; Cirino CM; Shukla D; Parsons BO; Flatow EL; Cagle PJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38242528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.
Raiss P; Edwards TB; Deutsch A; Shah A; Bruckner T; Loew M; Boileau P; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):e54. PubMed ID: 24695931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty with an anatomic press-fit short stem.
Szerlip BW; Morris BJ; Laughlin MS; Kilian CM; Edwards TB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 29032988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?
Holschen M; Kiriazis A; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 33880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Lee JH; Chun YM; Kim DS; Lee DH; Shin SJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2533-2542. PubMed ID: 33813010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Giordano MC; Corona K; Morris BJ; Mocini F; Saturnino L; Cerciello S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 35430369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cemented humeral stem
Uy M; Wang J; Horner NS; Bedi A; Leroux T; Alolabi B; Khan M
Bone Joint J; 2019 Sep; 101-B(9):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 31474140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
